Building 7 on 9/11/01 small fires and then a sudden collapse What ?

Question

answer this ! lucky larry is at it again winning his settlement!

bad samaritan is in denial ,its ok my friend!

hey just wonderin disrespecting the dead is our govt nottelling the truth!

building 7 got hit with very little debris cause bldngs3 4 5 absorbed most of it get your facts together before you make such a stupid statement!

LeAnne you are clueless!

Answer 1

Larry Silverstien said it best;PULL IT!

Answer 2

43,000 gallons of diesel fuel (emergency back-up generators supply) and you call this "SMALL FIRES?"
Never mind the structural damage from the debris thrown from the WTCs.
Give it up - the cause is self evident - this was a building, not a reinforced bunker.

Clueless? Did you even realize that building 7 was an emergency command center? Or that it did indeed contain 43,000 gallons of fuel for the emergency generators? Or that the generators and pumps started automatically when the power was shut down during all of the chaos? Or that, in all likely hood, the fuel tanks and/or lines were damaged when the towers collapsed?
Again, that's 43,000 gallons - leaking and under pressure - and that's no "small fire."
Clueless is excepting "facts" without checking valid and verifiable sources because they seem to support your own conclusions.

Answer 3

What???? is right. Building 7 is what finally convinced my unbelieving husband. He's now a loud voice for the cause!!
TRUTH People. Wake UP. Read some history.
Operation Northwoods.
Read the 911 commission report, compare the data.

All I see is name calling, is this what we've become? Love your country enough to question authority. Question the media.

Answer 4

I've seen this guy before. Insults those who disagrees, treats the U.S. government as guilty until proven innocent, ignores inconvenient things like national security in his quest for FULL disclosure in time of war (or as close as we've gotten for many years).

It's fairly silly. Especially when he doesn't even ask a proper question. It's all a soap box.

Do what you normally do when you see this on a street corner. Move along. Try not to look at them too closely. Don't show pity. They'll just try to pretend you are the bad guy because you don't give them what they want, and twist it in their heads into some demented "victory" because they made people "walk away" who "weren't worthy of the truth in the first place".

Let him keep his pride.

Answer 5

Check your facts.

It was more than "small fires", it was a lot of damage. Between the tower and B-7, was about 300 feet. When the plane hit, flames, and debris hit B-7. And more hit it when the Tower collapsed.

Answer 6

I saw on the same web site, it was Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld cooking weenies over an open fire. It got out of control and the building went down. Have the guts to admit it you wussy! Don't be so afraid of the truth! Stop defending the Bush Administration, robot!

Answer 7

would you stop disrespecting the dead from 9/11 you all say bush is bumber than a box of rock but yet can mastermind a 9/11 coverup make up your minds people or do you hate bush that much

Answer 8

Well Boom/Vato/Hippie/Crypto/Nancy/Brenda/Ginger/Sgt. BMF/Citizen of the New World/Neo-con Flavored Kool-Aide/ Surfer Dude/Skip/Skipper/etc. it looks like you have found yourself a new screen name.

Sadly, no new questions or sources.

Answer 9

read popular mechanics debunk 9/11, only idiots believe the crap terrorist post in here to scare Americans.

Answer 10

the sad thing is,, most people believe that Bush-Cheney are diabolical enough to have been responsible for 9-11,,,,