been looking for peer reviewed papers proving the 9/11 lie?

Question

http://www.journalof911studies.com/

Enjoy

Calico.........I read the 9/11 commission report twice .

Redphish..........check my link and check the math equations if you have the ability

zack.........I am not even American.Check out the math equations.They speak for themselves

Clair..........yes peer reviewed.Many of these professors,engineers and scientists have their email on the link I provided.Dont believe me.Check it out yourself

TE...........since when is basic physice\s math not a credible part of ANY paper

le anne well I have solved your dilemna.Check the link.If you can do the math in the equations that is

le anne well I have solved your dilemna.Check the link.If you can do the math in the equations that is.
here are some of the equations
http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/W7Kuttler.pdf

Answer 1

Good luck.

As far as my own research led me, there is no valid or verifiable "peer reviewed" papers to be found. There are, however, a lot of papers out there with a cult following of people with substantially less than a reliable scientific or structural background.

I formed my opinion concerning 9/11 based in a large part due to the absence of any of the alleged discoveries or contradictions not being printed in any scientific venue that could be reviewed by peers. They seem to be only on op-blogs, conspiracy websites and fictional "documentaries."
That's an enlightening find when one considers the credentials presented by some of the authors - wouldn't you think?
Reply:
Actually, I can "do the math."
The author of the site with all of the esoteric and pedantic calculations contends that free fall at that distance is 6 seconds - that's OK.
He then does his fuzzy math and has the building fall without any resistance from the same distance in 8.3 seconds.
That's approximately an 38% difference for two objects free falling the same distance. Maybe Sir Isaac was wrong when he was experimenting at the Leaning Tower when he theorized that all objects free fall at the same rate, you think?
And his footnote for the source of his actual fall time is bogus - despite his credentials - Steven Jones.

Answer 2

that's gas cos I in basic terms discovered a peer reviewed paper that suggested coaching contained in the cellular should be coded by technique of proteins and in no way nucleic acids and yet another that Kuru is probably brought about by technique of a pandemic. sturdy previous peer reviewing as sturdy because the subsequent peer reviewed paper that proves it incorrect etc

Answer 3

Nice effort. But the Journal of 911 Studies is hardly a peer-reviewed professional journal. It is a refuge for the folks that can't get their "conspiracy theories" published in any peer-reviewed professional journals!

Answer 4

Since we already know the 911 attack was by terrorist, why would I want to think , even for a second, that all the anti war posters like the peer review is correct. It is a bunch of same old Bush haters at work.

Answer 5

Read the 9-11 report. I mean you seem like the type that will get pissed off after reading a paragraph but just plug through it and THEN form your opinion.

Answer 6

Well then i guess you will have to spend the rest of you life, such as it is, looking for proof of the 9/11 lie.

Answer 7

Good luck in finding a credible paper.

Since they are providing only part of the story.

Answer 8

Yeah you can find those peers in Washington D.C. at Saint Elizabeth Mental Hospital. John Hinckley is their roommate, he'll escort you to them.

Answer 9

Anyone can start a website. That doesn't make you credible.

Answer 10

Nope.