English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what is your feeling on it
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7866929448192753501&q=loose+change&hl=en

2007-04-10 14:57:02 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

there is scientific data associated with this movie that is very interesting

2007-04-10 15:06:33 · update #1

16 answers

There are too many loose ends and unanswered questions to just say NO WAY and to tell you the truth the more of these documentaries are made and the more evidence is gathered, the guiltier our government looks.

What amazes me is how many people will VIOLENTLY refuse any evidence and/or facts regarding the matter and will ridicule you in response without actually debating the issue and/or talk about it in a civilized manner. I have come to realize that most of the people who refuse to believe it are people from rural U.S. or very small cities where family values still exist. Maybe that's why it comes as a shock to them.

I have personally lived in Washington D.C., New York, and now Los Angeles and have come to accept most of the facts and the evidence in these documentaries. All of my friends and family also think the same, as a matter of fact I don't personally know a single person who refutes it. Let me tell you what the usual response is "Hey, they're robbing and raping the country and the world and have the power to continue doing it. The only thing we can do is to shut up and go along with it". My question is "Until when?"

The first documentary of this type that came out was "911 in Plain Site". This documentary was made by talk radio host Dave VonKleist who has a show right here in the U.S. called the Power Hour.

Here's the link for 911 in Plain Site:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5386487651203625811&q=911+in+plain+site

I hope you enjoy it.

2007-04-11 15:44:55 · answer #1 · answered by Chuck 2 · 0 0

I don't see nor have I heard of an inside job here except for alot of theories. Loose Change presents information , I saw it as we failed after the fact to respond. Equally more explosive is the dates and back tracks of the timeline that led to the events. It could mean that we were not told but officials were aware and preparing. Now that is not unusual.
I am a mad scientist when it comes to this because it's fact but ?
Also a ex flight attendant. I told my Father to get off United in 1998 when Clinton playing golf said oh I guess I heard of 9 specific threats to the Pacific Rim aircrafts but let me get back to my ball in play...
I wish someone would pick up KGMB or someones tape of that . It's there. So is SWISS AIR111? an electrical fire where the owner lives as Mike Snow in Arkansas working on satellites now... it was his gaming devise that was blamed for that crash yet the pilots called out PAN PAN PAN
no mayday folks hijack all before 911 but in Canadian water
Yet as with these other dates we were under Bill Clinton's watch. Inside job, u leave a comic an easy line.

I feel sick but after ten years of barking at the wind, no one listened. U see a United Airlines Captain Honolulu based cry in your face in 1998 that is a hiijack code and your family thinks u are crazy your birthday is SEPTEMBER 12th?
I can tell you that the fmr FBI Director of my state said oh sh*t
and I am not on his wacky list.
I had not looked at it before, it's painful. My feelings are different I knew it was possible because of my job, just not where or when. I flew those planes full of fuel every day. As did the brave souls that perished along with the rest of our beloved family and friends. The after affects will possibly take more.

2007-04-10 15:49:23 · answer #2 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 1 0

Anyone with half a brain knows that 9-11 was an inside job. You can see the bombs going off all the way down as the building falls. A fireman on the scene said that afterwards every single bit of concrete, desks, chairs, computers, people, etc. were blown to DUST.

This was more than just a collapsing skyscraper, this was a building filled with high explosives. And I seriously doubt some mythical "Al Qaeda" had the authority or the ability to get past security and plant bombs throughout the building.

It was an inside job. Curiously, George Bush's brother, Marvin was head of security at the WTC buildings at the time. The truth is out there, the American sheep are just to scared to face it.

2007-04-10 15:29:44 · answer #3 · answered by robinhood 2 · 3 3

Wow, umm ...wow. properly we could start up with that video data... First, reducing rates do no longer "pass" as you describe. whilst i'm no longer responsive to the particular pictures you're bearing on, that's no longer correct. A reducing can charge does not do this's job and then be seen flowing out a burning and collapsing development. 2d, the cave in replace right into a hell of so lots extra in contact than what you're portraying right here. The helping shape replace into heated to the factor it grew to become malleable. In doing so the flooring sagged and the structural helps bowed. sparkling data of that's seen interior the video. the 1st data of that's the falling products of the exterior facade. that's seen occurring for an significant volume of time ahead of the cave in. the 2d data of that's clearly seen in video shot interior the previous couple of minutes ahead of the cave in: the flooring above the fireplace began to drop down onto the burning flooring. There are extensive fractures ordinarily seen in photos showing the corners of the development. in step with danger the main serious video data is the cave in itself. there is not any explosion, there is basically a cave in. The explosion led to by rates adequate to reason the cave in could have been of course seen interior the movies, yet none exists. and finally, the nail interior the coffin in this ridiculous concept is this assertion "the only way that would have got here approximately replace into by skill of severing the forty 8 steel columns on the middle, and in all probability severing the commencing place steel interior the basements additionally, there is not any 2 methods approximately it." back, the video of course shows the failure origniates at and above the flooring broken at impression, no longer decrease down. And one extra ingredient...there's a lot of video taken over the whole adventure that's close adequate to pay attention the two debris and bodies impacting at highway point. there is not any audio data of any explosions. As to the concept, that's riciculous in maximum of methods that's no longer mandatory to proceed. try doing some examine into what it takes to deliver down a development in a planned evolution. The cave in is chaotic, the failure factor is obvious. the clarification it happens so quickly is via the fact the failure mode replace into the proper 30 or so flooring collapsing onto the flooring below. It replace into no longer a pancake down via each floor. in case you will propose a concept, that's ordinarily an excellent concept to realize this with some forethought and intelligence particularly than blind hatred and idiocy.

2016-10-21 14:14:50 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Your scientific data is half truth, innuendo, and speculation. It does not even consider the reams of scientific data that patently debunk your movie nonsense.

Try the Popular Mechanics book, which refutes all your bogus slanted incomplete speculation masquerading as conclusion.

And somehow...I knew that Kelly was a kook right along with you.

2007-04-11 00:04:56 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 0 2

You might want to check out another video called "Screw Loose Change".

It points out the misrepresentations and factual errors in both Loose Change I and Loose Change II.

2007-04-10 16:23:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

All have to say is Yawn, refuted time and time again. Does anyone else find that the CT's are getting boring? At first, they got me mad, then I had to laugh at them, but now just boring. Just wondering if anyone else feels the same.

Now I'm sure the CT(s) will give me thumbs down. Still boring.

Oh well, 2 pts.

2007-04-10 15:40:32 · answer #7 · answered by robling_dwrdesign 5 · 1 3

Stop - and think for a moment.........there you go.........now consider that if out of all of the "unexplained facts," "documentaries" and conspiracy theories out there that if they contained any verifiable and valid proof of what they contend - well, simply put. can you imagine the back lash and real investigations that would be taking place?
It is absolutely ridiculous to contend that every reliable, valid and verifiable source of contradictory information is in on the conspiracy.

Unreliable sources, out of context quotes, bad science, ignorance, out right lies, cherry picked facts, biased conclusions and for what? (Hint: $$$$$$$$)

2007-04-10 15:36:38 · answer #8 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 3

The saddest part of it all is that the motivation behind it all is nothing but greed.

2007-04-10 16:46:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Great movie. the numbers of those that believe this are growing!

2007-04-10 17:48:30 · answer #10 · answered by Eyota Xin 3 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers