First it was right after Nov 06 if the dems won.
THEN it was as soon as the dems started in January.
LAST it was within three months. Here it is guys, three months plus - where are they?
Any con care to extend their prediction - again?
And don't give us the tired excuse "Bush protected us". You can't prove a negative.
2007-04-10 13:19:46 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yahoo Answers?!
2007-04-10 15:49:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There haven't been any since 9-11, before the Dems were elected. The same safe guards are in place now. There were plans, the Sears Tower and several other sky scrapers that were planned and found out by intercepting international calls. Those that can't legislate, investigate
2007-04-10 20:44:24 · answer #2 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dude we been killing those bastards and keeping them busy over there.The dems took over,yet they are powerless,Pres.Bush still runs the show.Your right, only a liberal can prove a negative.I predict the sh*t will hit the fan if a Democrat wins the presidency in 08.This country will be like Israel.You will have the privilege to get your a*s blown up while you are sipping your latte at starbucks.The islamo nazis have no fear of the libs at all.
2007-04-10 20:30:25 · answer #3 · answered by dumbuster 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush has been trying to continue his attacks of terror, take Iran for example. The Democrats being in Congress have prevented acts of terrorism if anything.
2007-04-10 20:24:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Do you mean the Senate Committee Hearings that the democrats are holding to make Bushies accountable for their corruption and abuse of power ?
The terror attacks(as THEY would call them) ( the ones THEY really Fear) have begun -Finally...............
2007-04-11 13:32:55 · answer #5 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's keep in mind they have not had a chance to do anything. Their first hundred days of "wanting to get things done" has yielded nothing. To prove a positive, the lack of the Democratic party to do anything has yielded us continued safety. So by your logic, Bush has kept us safe. Enjoy your continued safety. Care to rephrase your question?
Cheers.
2007-04-10 20:36:40 · answer #6 · answered by sarpedons 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The President is stiill on guard. Give it a few months if the Libs win the WHite House in 2008.
2007-04-10 20:23:19 · answer #7 · answered by aiminhigh24u2 6 · 3⤊ 4⤋
So you are actually trying to attribute lack of attacks to the dems credit? ... clue..... less.
2007-04-10 20:42:22 · answer #8 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Conservatives believe in the easter bunny, santa claus and the tooth fairy....in other words....don't listen to them.
2007-04-10 20:27:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
All the fuss was about a liberal President. Get your facts straight. There hasn't been another attack because Bush is still in power. Aren't you an angry libtard?
2007-04-10 20:23:29 · answer #10 · answered by SillierKimmie! 3 · 4⤊ 5⤋