English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

... We are saying Ewan Chatfield from New Zealand during the '80's...

2007-04-10 10:45:55 · 28 answers · asked by hemi 1 in Sports Cricket

28 answers

Phil Tufnell might as well have taken a snooker cue out with him, he was awful but made up for it by being the best spinner for a generation. God bless the cat!!!

2007-04-11 06:03:41 · answer #1 · answered by ph 6 · 1 0

C.A. Walsh of West Indies was the worst No. 11 Batsman in Test Cricket. He was out for duck on 43 occasions in 185 innings played by him. Next to him is GD McGrath of Australia with 35 ducks in 138 innings.

2007-04-10 12:02:06 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

The worst (even worse than Bob Willis) has to be Courtney Walsh of the West Indies.It is a running joke that Courtney could'nt bat. I remember Willis making 24 in a test against Australia or West Indies (when they were good), although there were a lot of fluky shots in the innings...not sure if Walsh has ever made more than 10 in a game...but I am probably wrong.

2007-04-10 11:10:16 · answer #3 · answered by mikers 3 · 0 0

approximately duminy: he does have a large batting type, however the remark is absurd and way too early for that assertion. approximately your perspectives on Ponting, your for sure biased and don't delight in a cricketing legend and in case you think of sachin and lara are a class above then your only fooling your self. the only participant a class above is Sir Don Bradman, accompanied via the subsequent class: ponting, tendulkar and lara. to function to pontings protection, his commonly used has bigger on account that being captain, he's rebuilding a set actually from scratch and leads via occasion via scoring runs. look in the icc scores of maximum suitable batsman, Pontings optimum ever score is alot bigger then tendulkars, to not point out he hasnt been out of the terrific 10 on account that 2002. So do not say Ponting isn't a legend and is undoubtly the main suitable on account that bradman

2016-10-28 09:16:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you consider the most number of ducks (zeroes) and least number of runs scored, two players stand out - B.S.Chandrasekhar of India and Courtney Walsh of West Indies. However, if you are looking at entertainment value, i.e. batsmen running away comically from the ball or trying atrocious shots, Phil Tuffnell of England and Muralitharan of Sri Lanka would be contenders too.

2007-04-11 01:52:28 · answer #5 · answered by arviemail 1 · 0 0

Right country, wrong man!!!

What about Chris Martin of New Zealand?
Nicknamed the Walking Wicket by his team mates

ODI batting average = 1.19 Top Score = 7
Test average = 2.26 Top Score = 3

Awesome

2007-04-10 23:15:08 · answer #6 · answered by Peggy 3 · 0 0

Brian Lara

2007-04-11 03:52:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I would have to say Glen McGrath although he is an awesome bowler, his batting has never really gotten off the ground but being an aussie we still love him and the day his retirement comes into effect it's going to be a very sad day for australia.

2007-04-10 16:31:02 · answer #8 · answered by jimmy_chick78 4 · 0 0

Virendar Shewag

2007-04-11 05:04:41 · answer #9 · answered by watsup 4 · 0 0

Phil Tuffnell

2007-04-10 22:00:19 · answer #10 · answered by Santee 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers