Was that a big slap in the face to the administration? She did not listen to them.
Does this mean that the Democrats are flexing their power against the Republicans?
2007-04-10 07:55:57 · 23 answers · asked by . 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If the Democrats had any power to flex they would have ended the war instead of sending sternly worded memos.
I am embarrassed to be a Democrat with the way they are acting, they have no spine. Pandering little wimps.
Instead of going to Syria, Nancy Pelosi should have stayed here and done her job.
2007-04-10 07:59:12 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Old news, what do you think about Republican congressmen going to the middle east before Nancy Pelosi did? Was that to kiss behinds those governments so Bush could be seen as a decided/leader?
2007-04-10 08:01:31 · answer #2 · answered by furrryyy 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It is business as usual....Newt Gingrich went to China against Clinton's wishes after the Republican's took control of Congress in the 90's.
2007-04-10 08:02:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the democrats have made clear that over the next months they are going to be talking to foreign governments for when they take over in 08. they are out there making friends with terrorists and assassins and even nancy pelosi is out there speaking on behalf of other governments. it is crystal clear what the agenda of miss america and her comrades are doing. they are traitors an nothing else.
2007-04-10 08:04:30 · answer #4 · answered by afterflakes 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋
It means Nancy had better get a good lawyer, or read up on the Logan Act.
She could be in more trouble than she thinks.
I didn't see "Executive Powers" listed in the House Speaker job duties.
Tip O'Neill would never have done such a thing in his day.
2007-04-10 08:01:01 · answer #5 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Nancy Pelosi is the epitome of what the Democrat leaders are. She is a stupid fool it really is a strategies over her head, First she denies the existence of a conflict in Iraq, and then she travels to a terrorist helping us of a and rewards the ruler with a "State" visit from the U. S.. What a thoroughly stupid element to do. Do you liberals accessible comprehend how a lot your elected Democrat leaders have harmed the conflict attempt, and the overseas coverage of this us of a with their consistent whining about the President and each and every thing he does? The conflict in Iraq ought to have probably been over by using now if the enemy wasn't rooting for the democrats to carry down the President.
2016-11-28 02:58:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She did not to the Middle East alone, in fact she went with some republicans.
Diplomacy is a higher cause than war.
Kudos to those seeking peace.
2007-04-10 08:00:30 · answer #7 · answered by Johnny 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
She is a joke. And she told some fabrications that were embarrassing for her when the truth was revealed.
She wants so badly to be someone.
2007-04-10 08:10:43 · answer #8 · answered by martinmagini 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's a big gamble that the results will not manifest until it's too late. They're riding a wave and hoping that it will take them to victory.
2007-04-10 07:59:29 · answer #9 · answered by madbaldscotsman 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
She's grandstanding and disrespecting the lawful power structure of the US government. She's lucky there isn't a crime called "light treason".
2007-04-10 07:59:39 · answer #10 · answered by All hat 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋