Should HIV test be conducted mandatory by bride and groom before marriage?

Question

This has become a very big problem in the country..
Many men and women are cheating each other!!
HIV affected people marry a normal person and after a year or 2 only the normal person cometo know about this!Then they will be having 1 or 2 kids also!!
Even many people committed suicide on knowing this!
Even this has been discussed in many television channel programmes!

Just feel free to tell your opinion regarding this!!!

Answer 1

i really think that u should get tested before u get married it just sooths thing over and calms things if ur partner had HIV and u married thme and had kids u just affected ur self and ur kids and just makd things worse for every one but there is always adoption there are millions of kids who need homes so u could always work around it if u really loved the pperson and didnt want to break it of because of it but all people are the same u shouldnt judge the person because of it they are still the same person on the inside and the same person u fell in love with

Answer 2

No it is an invasive test as in the physical part and the personal privacy and should not be used. It was used for a short time in Illinois and a couple sued and got it stopped. Now you don't even get the blood test for Rh factor any more. They found out in Illinois the HIV tests were too expensive and took too long to get results. As to an infected person marrying without telling his or her partner they have it : that goes into a personal problem between them. It is a case of basing a marriage on a lie.

Answer 3

I never used to think this, but cosidering the amount of people that have it and spread it, I'm beginning to think maybe it SHOULD be mandatory testing. I do know the last two times I got pregnant I got tested for HIV. They said it's "standard" testing, so why not do "standard" testing for marriage license? I don't like the government telling me what I can and can't do, but this could be for the safety of SO many people!

Answer 4

I think that this needs to be a factor for more people when they are deciding to become sexually intimate with someone. The only way that you should wait until you get married to find this out is if you are waiting to have sex until your wedding night.

If singles started requiring a STD test before having sex, the spreading of these diseases would stop.

Answer 5

Here in California the Blood Test before Marriage is mandatory, if something shows up they won't give you a license to Marry.

Answer 6

because of the upward push in HIV and AIDS, many states now require that events employing for a marital license could be presented an HIV try to/or could be presented with advice on AIDS and assessments attainable. on the instant, no states demands an important premarital HIV/AIDS try. So, actually, that's necessary in some states which you would be able to be presented the try, notwithstanding it is not required to take it.

Answer 7

Make it a law! Whats the big problem?Dont be selfish! I believe if you really love the intended spouse then you should be truthful from the git go!Why make so many people sick along the way! The test is non invasive, so do it and save a life or two!

Answer 8

In the old days blood tests were required before marriage..I dont know why they stopped but I think its a great idea to reinstate this practice for both parties involved. Its a skerry thing to know but also a good thing.

Answer 9

Yes, when i get married me and the groom will be getting tested. I've been with my man for sometime now we have a baby 10mos. but who knows what he might do behind my back from now until my wedding day. Which by the way has no set date.

Answer 10

Shame on you Airtom. HIV does not discriminate white or black can get it. and I think it should be done before two people start to have sex. What I mean at the beginning of a relationship.