If ANY of the bigger country´s today would go head on in war...?

Question

would there really be a possible winner because they all have such great army´s and not to mention the nuclear weapons, and even if one of the country´s would somehow win,wouldn't the economy and the army of the "winning" country have suffered to greatly by the war to recover, at least for a long,long time. I hope a disaster like this never happens, but do you think i´m right?

Answer 1

if nuclear weapons were involved then there would be no winners.

Answer 2

No. The definition of "winner" and "loser" does not amount to the total destruction of the opponent's forces. It amounts to the "loser" no longer having the will to fight.

If you and I were to have a fist fight and I knocked you down and you refused to get up. I am the winner. I don't have to kill you to prove that.

This is why we are "losers" in Iraq. Not because they beat us militarily, but because we do not have the will to fight. With the advances in weapon technology, this will become more evident and obvious as time goes on.

Answer 3

The U.S.A would win because even though China has more troops availability than us, we have better training,supplies,weapons,and more nuclear power.

Though I do see your point and think it would destroy the world almost, if not, completely , if everyone used nuclear missiles.

Answer 4

All any country needs to do is PRESS THE BUTTON.

Anyone remember the movie, The Mouse That Roared?

Answer 5

If a war like that would break out, humanity deserves to be destroyed.

Answer 6

no won would win except the countries that didnt fight

Answer 7

You are right, but it will inevitably happen. Natural resources are not forever, and eventually we shall have to fight for them.

Answer 8

u r right there would no winner