2007-04-10 07:01:25 · 18 answers · asked by osama 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I guess we need to change 2+2=5
2007-04-10 07:11:33 · answer #1 · answered by I AM BACK 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, 2+2 is not 4
2007-04-10 14:26:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1+1 is 2 so what the frick I should rule the world plus I would be damn good at it.
2007-04-10 16:41:45 · answer #3 · answered by ~K♥Baby~ 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, if the inverse is also true, which in math cannot necessarily be decided upon. Besides, in your own mind you are already god, so what would be the point of lowering yourself to merely ruling this world?
2007-04-10 14:06:12 · answer #4 · answered by John B 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If everything is simple as that, then I should have been the Lord of Light and Arts by now. No one should rule the world. It can't possibly be as simple as that. Like Einstein said : "Everything should be simple, as it is, not simpler."
2007-04-10 15:28:27 · answer #5 · answered by hinpianist 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
2+2 is not always 4 as it depends on the algebraic space you are working within.
2007-04-10 14:58:03 · answer #6 · answered by agila13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your consequent does not logically follow the antecedent. Until you can come to terms with that, no, you should not rule the world. We need logical leaders.
2007-04-10 14:12:25 · answer #7 · answered by Kevin C 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If E=mc2, then shouldnt Einstein rule the world?
2007-04-10 14:15:41 · answer #8 · answered by ginger ♥ edward cullen 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ah, a ha well you put your kid through 4 years of college (Philosophy) and this is what you get, a perfectly useless philosopher, I think Socrates warned us about this kind.
2007-04-10 14:19:19 · answer #9 · answered by sean e 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What if you DO rule the world?
Makes ya kind-a crappy, don't it?
Hey, Osama, go google my "Oh, Osama" parody.
{Here's a bit of it}
"Oh, Osama, there's no need for Jihad /
there ain't a heaven with virgins /
and there ain't a god"
2007-04-10 15:09:22 · answer #10 · answered by Tor Hershman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋