Should Pelosi be sentenced to GITMO for undermining America policy!?!?

Answer 1

You mean for carrying out WHY we elected a Democratic Congress?

Answer 2

Senator Pelosi was doing what she thought was right...but I believe acts like this only strengthens the enemy's resolve,
and that is something we don't need happening right now!

Urban warfare will always be too unpopular for the American
public to support...just too much innocent blood has to be
spilled and too many troops have to be hurt or killed when
the enemy is willing to hide behind its civilian population...
..the sight of innocent people being hurt or killed is too much
for most Americans to accept, yet there is no other way to
root the enemy out...

Pelosi to GITMO? NO...but she didn't help matters for our
side of the struggle.

Answer 3

Diplomacy with two faces has never been advised in American politics, it is essentially what Jessie Jackson did when he intervened - only worse, as she actually holds office.

It makes the diplomatic stance of America weak, and that isn't good policy. I actually kind of hope Democrats will win in 2008 so I can start blaming someone else for all my problems like they do now with Bush.

Even though I didn't like Clinton and thought he had no business being Commander in Chief, I was sworn to serve him, and while I blamed a lot of things on him, I didn't blame EVERYTHING on him. Bush leads, Pelosi follows, if she wants to be President, then she should have run for the office in 2004.

Pelosi should have her passport revoked, that way she will be stuck in whatever sh*th*le she next visits without a return visa. Were I President, that is what I would do. I would start being the evil SOB that everyone makes me out to be, were I Bush.

She is aiding our enemy, period. We don't need her "diplomacy" right now, it just proves that we are weakened and I hope you all sleep better in 2008 - knowing that Daniel Caffey is on the job and not Colonel Nathan R. Jessup.

Answer 4

Pelosi is clueless and therefore can not be blamed for anything she has done. she would not understand that her extended visit to GITMO is punishment. however she is not suited for the job which she has been appointed. Cali voters are the actual problem here, so we should allow California to become their own country (this also would allow Anold to be the prez at least of Cali).

Answer 5

Well, something should be done. She may have possibly violated the Logan Act.

On April 10, 2997, an article written by Carla Mariunucci appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, indicating that Ms. Pelosi and Rep. Lantos are interested in making a "diplomatic trip" to Iran.
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/10/BAGV9P6C0S6.DTL
Pelosi, Lantos may be interested in diplomatic trip to Iran
Furthermore, the article quoted Rep Lantos as saying that he co-sponsored legislation with Ms. Pelosi which could pass as early as May that calls for making available to all countries --including Iran -- nuclear fuel for peaceful purposes under international oversight by establishing a "nuclear fuel bank".

I believe that the legislation is:
HR 6 Clean Energy Act of 2007
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&docid=f:h6ih.txt.pdf

Those who advocate the "nuclear fuel bank" consider that clean nuclear technology would be available to all countries. However, those who argue against the "nuclear fuel bank" point out that the uranium enrichment process (using centrifuges to separate isotopes as in the FEP at Natanz, Iran) can also be used to produce a more pure grade of uranium 235 which may be used in a nuclear bomb.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4416482.stm
http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/28/opinion/edbuffett.php
http://www.goodharborreport.com/node/295

The head of the Iranian Nuclear Energy Organization, Gholam-Reza Aghazadeh, explains it thus:
The simple way is to inject 0.7% (uranium) and obtain 3.5%, right? Now, if you take this 3.5% and inject it again into the chain (of centrifuges), the result will be 20%. If you inject the 20% back into the chain, the result will be 60%. If you inject this 60%, the result will be 90%.
http://www.memritv.org/Transcript.asp?P1=1120
http://www.memritv.org/Search.asp?ACT=S6&P1=2,148&P3=4

Since Iran has uranium enrichment capabilities at its FEP (fuel enrichment plant) at Natanz, giving Iran nuclear "fuel" enriched to 3.5% might not be a good idea if Iran does have the agenda to develop a nuclear bomb.

The BBC article (listed below) describes the nuclear fuel process.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/05/nuclear_fuel/html/mining.stm

Answer 6

I have no problem with her going to try and find what the truth is for herself.
Do you really trust the person who the secret service didn't even rush to safety when the country was allegedly attacked on 9/11/01?
They haven't even told him yet that the Pentagon was not hit by a passenger Jet.

Answer 7

Sherylyo and Wolgang; Your law degrees are from where? The University of Rush Limbaugh? Why are you not complaining about the 2 Republcan (men) Representatives who were in Syria the day before her and the one who was there the day after her?To me,this shows that you are merely following the speaking points of the Neo-Con playbook.

Answer 8

Oooooh, this is a great question. YES. And the biggest reason is, she is doing what is in the best interest of her party (Democrats), not in the best interest of the American People. This, is Treason pure and simple. Of course, she is not alone, they all do it. And if the truth be known, it doesn't matter because these people are not running our country anyway. No, I will not tell you who is.

Answer 9

collaboration with the enemy during any war is treason , punishable by death. today tar and feathering sounds better, but it would be crowded, we'd have to do Jane Fonda, Hillary Clinton, Bill Clinton. Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, and all the other shysters in D.C. want to guess where the tar comes from. yep TEXAS sameplace all your gasoline comes from.

Answer 10

I know this might seem strange to you, but you should read the U.S. Constitution. The government has three, co-equal branches.

Additionally, what would you do about the Republicans who traveled to Syria?

Answer 11

Should Dennis Hastert be sentenced to GITMO for undermining American policy? Or do we have a double standard? Which is it?