2007-04-10 06:07:10 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I hope not, we would have a singing president then.
Well, maybe he would be a little more entertaining for a public address.
2007-04-11 12:36:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you reffering to Howard or Sanjaya as president. I would vote for Stern in a second. I can tell these people on here have no idea about how powerful Howard still is. His radio show on sattelite still has more listenership than most public talk radio morning shows.
2007-04-10 06:17:03 · answer #2 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Umm...NO! You people do realize that on idol, the people can vote hundreds of times. In the election, every citizen has only one vote to cast...so Sanjaya would have been long gone by now.
While I'm at it, I think the voting system on Idol is very flawed for allowing people to vote so many times!! And Howard Stern is a dumb a** who is hell bent on ruining idol. However, he's really just ruining a shot of a lifetime for some of the TALENTED & ELIMINATED contestants!
2007-04-10 16:11:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Probably. Apparently, considering who we now have serving in that capacity. Too many Americans no longer look at the issues and actually study candidate's positions before deciding who to vote for. We have become a nation of voters who decide more on personality, rhetoric, misinformation, and religion than anything else. So - why not Sanjaya?
2007-04-10 06:22:08 · answer #4 · answered by arkiemom 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Howard Who? Since he departed terrestrial radio the "King of All Media" is nothing more than a fart in a windstorm.
Claiming credit for Sanjaya astoundingly still being in the race is ridiculous since it has less to do with Stern and more to do with the millions of Asian Indians and teenage girls who vote for him.
2007-04-10 06:16:07 · answer #5 · answered by J Angelica 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Maybe but Stern wasn't successful in getting Kerry elected.
2007-04-10 06:21:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It turns out that its NOT Howard Stern, but Indian employees (mostly outsourced) and their families in India who are making the calls.
2007-04-10 06:20:37 · answer #7 · answered by Geminess 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Howard couldn'tkeep himself on public radio, I doubt he can keep Sanjaya on AI if indeed that is what is happening. I realize he is making more profits off of satelite. Oops I said a liberal dirty word. "Profits"
2007-04-10 06:16:27 · answer #8 · answered by mbush40 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush is an idiot.
Howard choose to leave public radio.
Bush should read something for a change instead of making up stuff.
2007-04-10 06:18:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not for several years. You have to be 35 in order to be President.
2007-04-10 06:11:59 · answer #10 · answered by namsaev 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He will have to wait until he is 35 to run according to the Constitution...
Seriously, NO. I don't think that many people listen to Stern anymore now that he is not on regular radio.
2007-04-10 06:10:16 · answer #11 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋