Rico
2007-04-10 05:00:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by tootslemom 4
·
3⤊
0⤋
Allow peta to volunteer to take the place of the animals. They either admit a human is worth more than an animal or they save an animal and we get more accurate test results. You can't loose.
2007-04-10 12:00:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by malaysniper 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I think there are plenty of interesting characters around YA, especially P&S that would either volunteer or be willing to do so for a small stipend. However using your suggestion, I volunteer my ex wife.
2007-04-10 12:06:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would volunteer my ex-partner, but he's already dead. Let's dig him up and start the testing!!! HA HA HA!!!!
(hey Spoon, you connected to me and I dont know how to accept or allow or something. Do I need to do anything or is that the message I get when someone stars my question? you can email me at happyhead64@yahoo.com
and thanks for answering my question....
:-)~~
-scoTT in Atlanta
2007-04-10 18:00:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Rotten Johnny 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
LOL. I second the vote for in-laws! In a way bad but in other ways oh-so-good!
(Great ethical question as well, btw--not in-laws but your original question)
2007-04-10 12:10:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Sin™ 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I love animals but I'm not completely against animal testing... remember, animal testing helps find cures for your pets too. My pet is more important than a rat.
2007-04-10 12:00:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by Little Girl 2
·
3⤊
1⤋
Gitmo prisoners
2007-04-10 11:59:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well test on all the inhuman, they are worse then animals.
2007-04-10 18:04:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Dream_Catcher 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
people or just test it on nothing
2007-04-10 12:01:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by lucky888☺ 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Mayb.. Evil people!?
2007-04-10 16:06:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by babyyocca 5
·
1⤊
0⤋