I've seen some answers admitting guilt to the question you pose...I suspect a lot of those are conservatives answering for liberals.
But the interesting thing I note is that neither the conservative nor the liberals pose solutions to get their respective parties out of the clutching grasps of the radicals that control both.
Both democrat and republicans voice opinions that "their" radicals are better that the other "radicals" because....(fill in the blank here).
Your question was enlightened and asks really for who recognizes the cancer in both parties and who is willing to do something to cure the parties of the disease.
My conclusion is that both parties are terminal at this juncture, being run primarily by politicians that have sold out to the political class.
The only hope for American politics is that there will arise in America a third and fourth (or more) strong political parties that will force the republican and democrat parties to again be honest with voters and be true to our constitution for a change.
I seek integrity and representation elsewhere than the two main parties now. My vote will not be WASTED on a democrat or republican ever again.
I believe they both have betrayed America and are past redemption.
2007-04-10 05:04:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure, but I imagine you could count those only in the hundreds. Do you really believe that there are a large number of "anit-american communist sympathizers" in this country? I think our biggest problem is the huge majority of people who are completely apathetic to the political process and don't care to get involved because of the crazy wackos on both sides who claim to speak for half the country when they're really only speaking for a fringe.
2007-04-10 04:55:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by yodadoe 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
As a conservative I see wackos on both sides. Problem is they do not win the elections. It's the people in the middle that can make or break you. With that being said, I think Pelosi will have a hard time retaining control of the congress come next elections. She leans way too far left, border line wacko, and has to appease both moderate and far left agendas of the Democratic party. Middle America will see this and down she goes. The left has waaaaay more caucus's to have to please.
2007-04-10 05:01:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by mbush40 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Neoconservatism is a logical results of what Republicans have consistently stood for as a results of fact the 2d international war with as absolute backside factor the Reagan social massacre and foreign places coverage hypocrisy. Later got here Newt with the classic tax scheme reinvented. The Necons are no longer something new and that i do no longer think usa desires "real" conservatives. usa desires a push to the left. by skill of underfunding needed government centers to the threshold of cave in they tutor government is inefficient and the unfastened industry is often extra powerful. they do no longer fund proper and then use the inevitable unfavorable service as a reason to fund it even much less or perhaps abolish it. the only ingredient the yank perfect is sweet at is PR as a results of fact the above occasion of perverse potential politics isn't called such by skill of maximum individuals yet welcomed as a results of fact the hollow low taxes rhetoric. data are Republicans are for great funds and don't care approximately basic individuals no count if or no longer they are Democrats or Republicans
2016-10-21 12:53:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Communism is dead, how can there be sympathizers to a dead movement? Liberals just want the right to be free and not have someone else intstill their version of morallity on everyone as if they know better. The government's job is to accept diversity (not just tolerate it) and to protect the freedoms granted by the Constitution, not take one side of a debate and enact laws to limit freedoms to placate Conservative elitsts...doing so equates to fascism and is, what I feel, the underlying problem with the Conservative aspect of the Republican Party.
2007-04-10 05:01:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sure. The difference is I know that most cons are not in the wing nut category while many cons on this board lump all liberals and democrats into the anti America category when really it's just a small minority.
2007-04-10 04:57:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I might not agree with who many of the far right label as anti-american communist sympathizers.. but if they are bad enough that I label them that way.. then in my mind they may claim the party.. but the party doesn't represent them.. big difference.
2007-04-10 04:56:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by pip 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
First off, liberal is not a political party. Liberalism and communism are quite different, communism is the extreme far left of the political spectrum.
The same way conservatism is different from fascism, fascism is to the extreme far right of the political spectrum.
2007-04-10 05:04:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by Think 1st 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will admit that we have some who's political ideology is close to that of Communism, but those "wackos" on the right are close to fascism. I don't believe any of them truly hate America.
2007-04-10 04:57:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by the_end_of_the_cons 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
As a conservative/liberal (I agree with opinions on both sides), I see radicals on both the right and the left. Problems arise when radicals on either side attain any degree of power.
Wouldn't it suck if everyone thought the same way?
I am lucky to be an American.
2007-04-10 05:01:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋