Then why would you want to widen the chasm?
Giuliani is arrogant, bigoted, ill tempered and a womanizer. He divorced his 2nd wife, Donna Hanover, by announcing it at a press conference instead of telling her in person first. He was having an affair with an aide while living at Gracie Mansion & while still married and mayor of NYC while taking credit for all the good things that were done by others in “the city”. He fired William Bratton; the police commissioner in 1994 when he found out he made the cover of Time magazine because he (Giuliani) wanted to take the credit for the innovative crime fighting. I lived in NY during his dictatorship, and believe me; I would not want him as president. His character is far worse than Bush & Clinton's worse faults rolled into one, if you can believe that's possible. Even his own kids don’t talk to him, now, what does that tell you? His name should be Mussoliani.
As for 9/11…. he’s no hero, he just happened to be in the right place at the right time. The real heroes of 9/11 were the NYC firefighters & police plus all the other rescue workers from the surrounding tri-state areas who voluntarily came to pitch in & help us.
It has also been recently discovered that he had mob ties & that his father was a convicted felon. I’m sure as time goes by more skeletons will come out of his closet.
OK, here’s some links:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17081159/sit...
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17427328/site/newsweek/
http://bluetiderising.blogspot.com/2007/03/firefighters-turn-against-ruy-giuliani.html
YA: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070316145855AAMZam9
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17439294/site/newsweek/
Slate:
http://www.slate.com/id/2160285/
2007-04-10 03:05:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
i'm in simple terms extremely astonished that some liberals even attempt to declare that none of their brethren denies the life of terrorism . Or that any of their brethren diminishes the probability of terrorism . fully unfaithful and disgusting . They understand their brethren think of that way , yet foolishly attempt to conceal it through denying it . I in simple terms wanna throw-up when I witness this enormous Lie . i think of you're analogy grow to be great . EDIT ** take-heed call -- To show a factor , I in simple terms asked a query approximately whether human beings think of Radical Islamic Terrorists are a grave probability or is the probability overblown . result ? properly , so some distance 19 solutions and 5 of them do no longer think of it incredibly is lots of a probability !! it incredibly is over 25% !! So the deniers on right here have truthfully BEEN shown incorrect !! And right here is one for you and for every physique else honest sufficient to envision for themselves . in simple terms in the previous the mid-term elections , i grow to be posting many questions in regards to the hazards of Radical Islam / Terrorists . and that i could upload that i grow to be between the FEW on right here who completely regarded the authentic probability . you does not have faith the quantity of folk(quite often liberal Democrats) who thoroughly disregarded it as a theory of folly and pointless difficulty and worry . i understand , I fought that conflict daily . And the liberals disagreed lots that they falsely stated me until I have been given suspended for it . many situations they stated me for 'insulting an entire faith'. .. faith ? Radical Islam ? What ?!?! . And to make concerns much extra confounding , Yahoo Katie mentioned the comparable !! What ?!?! Yup , those comparable deniers as we communicate have been so uninformed that they and Yahoo Katie publicly published that Radical Islam grow to be a faith !! actuality Be oftentimes happening !!
2016-12-08 23:07:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They could never do what Geroge Bush has done for the Democratic party over the last six years. After this presidency, I would be surprised if a Republican is ever elected President again. As for Rosie, that is like saying that Ann coulter represents conservatives. You can pick a bad example from either party, but they only represent themselves, not the beliefs of the party.
2007-04-10 02:53:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Relax buddy. You're sucking Rush Limbaugh down a little too strong.
Soon you'll lose the capacity for ANY individual thought, let alone your own political idealogy.
2007-04-10 03:19:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
Have you ever listened to Michael Savage?
2007-04-10 02:54:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Please don't ask me to explain insanity.
2007-04-10 03:10:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Philip H 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
You watch too much FOX NEWS!!!
2007-04-10 02:54:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by n8ball 1
·
4⤊
2⤋