English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

20 answers

There is no difference. They both love to screw working men up the a**

2007-04-10 02:41:53 · answer #1 · answered by Buck Flair 4 · 0 0

Be Tony Blair and have to support Newcastle United. Being gay looks quite rosy in comparison.

2007-04-10 09:37:23 · answer #2 · answered by Del Piero 10 7 · 1 0

I would be Tony Blair and find out all his secrets so I could write a brilliant expose article to show him for the liar he is!

2007-04-10 09:33:04 · answer #3 · answered by Adele G 2 · 0 0

I'd be gay only if some of the hotest female celebs around also were. Halle Berry, Jennifer Garner, Angelina, Christina A.

2007-04-10 09:35:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'd be Tony Blair, because lying is still easier than being gay.

2007-04-10 09:30:49 · answer #5 · answered by The Rooster 3 · 0 0

Well becoming Tony would mean a sex change, so that in itself would be interesting. Plus I'm not interested in women, so I'd be Tony, but interested in men, so I'd be both!!

2007-04-10 09:41:29 · answer #6 · answered by Ellie L 5 · 0 0

Tony B-liar so it would be easy to me to lie

2007-04-10 09:32:02 · answer #7 · answered by Mag 7 · 0 0

Tony Blair, so I coud sort this Country out!

2007-04-10 09:30:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Tough choice... Taken up the jacksie or spend an evening with cherie (dartford tunnel gob) blair... the gay option looks tempting when you look at the alternative!!!

2007-04-10 09:34:05 · answer #9 · answered by Chelsea Shrimper 6 · 0 0

I could be gay for the night; that doesn't mean I have to do anything with anyone.

2007-04-10 09:34:16 · answer #10 · answered by dyingatwork 6 · 0 0

tony blair. so i could rush through emergency bills and put things right like immigration and hospitals.
i think i might even bring back hanging.

2007-04-10 09:42:28 · answer #11 · answered by pamela g 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers