Do you think anybody under 14 should be listed on the National Sex Offender Registry????

Question

Think again!!!

https://records.txdps.state.tx.us/DPS_WEB/Sor/index.aspx?PageIndex=Display&SID=06423998

this individual was only 13 when he was first listed. And he will be listed for the rest of his life because he did what a 13 year old with hormones does... he fondled his 11 year old neighbor!!!

Answer 1

That is exactly why the registries are not doing what they intended to do. Only seriouse offenses such as rape or actual child molestation should be listed. As of now, the registries are so deluted that parents can not differenciate between true dangers or just a case of poor judgement.

Answer 2

For those calling Samian a liberal, I even have seen his responses in the two politics and faith for it sluggish now. i'd challenge he's midsection-precise on some subject concerns and midsection-left on others. he's with the help of no skill an extremist. that's a stressful question, considering the fact that my brother's daughter became molested. I want I had a company answer yet I lean in the direction of unconstitutional, basically like that tutor-off choose some years in the past in FL who made DUI offenders activity bumperstickers. and that i do no longer drink.

Answer 3

no I don't. Not at all.

It always makes me sad and angry when I hear about these things. It could have been handeled so much better.

The kid is not a monster. What he did may have been wrong, especially if the situation was forced, but what society is doing to the boy is a mental rape for life.

Answer 4

No, as it is likely they have only been pawns in a adults game to identify more with their abuser because the adult in the situation had "power" over them. It is hard for an abused child to know know is right (or wrong) up to that age.

Answer 5

nah...lets wait until their resume gets better...say when they reach 21 and are really qualified!