Wrong. The correct answer is 'abortion'.
2007-04-10 00:30:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by completelysurroundedbyimbeciles 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Abortion is wrong and should be prevented.
However, until everyone agrees, as long as there are unresolved religious differences regarding when a soul enters a body, laws cannot be biased either for or against abortion without violating First Amendment religious freedom of the opposing side. So by constitutional equality, there must be a consensus on policy before laws can be made regarding abortion (as well as other spiritual issues of termination, including euthanasia and the death penalty).
In the meantime, abortion can and should be prevented by promoting education and informed consent regarding the process and its consequences.
2007-04-10 13:03:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Nghiem E 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is one of the thorniest issues of the past and present centuries...cannot be answered easily with a "yes" or a "no"...
It may depend on the circumstances, however, putting religious topics appart, I think abortion is very justified if there is risk for the mother (the life of the mother) and believe me, in cases of rape followed by pregnancy..Or when very grave malformations are detected i.e. absence of the four limbs as it happened in the 60s with Thalidomide in Northern Europe.
Any human being would be grateful of being spared from suffering a miserable life, and being an emotional and economical burden for him or herself or the parents or even less important...The State--
Other circumstances alleged such as "The right to do what I like or as I please or decide over my own body" embraced by some groups is completely unjustified and even murderous in nature....They are NOT deciibg about their bodies, bot about a new life of a newly formed human being.. its somebodies elses life....most of the times a healthy product, that is a human being that could be a blessing or a curse for mankind,...(It is not for us to decide since we are not Gods)
The question here beyond theological and other issues is...when a human being starts being a human being? (forgive my redundancies, however, you can get my point"
Its not an answer of black or white...there are too many areas of gray.......
2007-04-10 07:47:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sehr_Klug 50 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
WAY WRONG.
Since when are we God that we can end a life before it even begins and thus alter history?
Suppose that child had been Mozart or Einstein?What if that child could have a discovered a cure for cancer when they grew up?How many people suffering from cancer did you indirectly sentence to death and pain by aborting that baby?
And if you say a woman has the right to control her own body,what about the future woman who could be in her womb(who by the way is a separate body from conception)?Does SHE not have even the right to life,the most BASIC human right of all?And what about the woman's feelings of guilt after the abortion-which,unless she has a heart of ice,she WILL have.
Abortion is Nazi eugenics in it's most potent form.
We've killed more babies than Hitler ever killed Jews(and he killed 6 million...a considerable number).Come to thjink of it,we've beaten Lenin and Mao Tseung,too.
If we carry on this slaughter,we'd better stop calling them villains...we,after all,with our slaughter of the innocents,are much,MUCH worse.
2007-04-10 07:44:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The world cannot take care of the children already living here, why bring more into the world?
In my opinion, if someone doesn't want to or isn't ready to have a baby, they shouldn't be forced to.
I do disagree with the idea of how women can get an abortion, when the farther of the baby is willing to commit to being a single parent to the child.
2007-04-10 07:31:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by 9987 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
It depends on the reason. If a woman is raped or incest, or a chance that the mother and/or baby will die in child birth, or if the financial situation makes it impossible to take proper care of the child, than yes I think abortion is okay. We already have way to many children who need to be adopted.
If a woman uses abortion as means of birth control then hell no.
2007-04-10 07:32:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
abortion, i think it is ok up until 8 weeks because before that there is no heart beat. just some really creepy alien looking thing inside you. first couple of weeks it looks like a mushroom too. lol. after that when the heart starts to beat then it's wrong. plus 8 weeks gives you plenty of time to find out your pregnant and set up a date at the clinic.
2007-04-10 07:32:19
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
wrong ... ur killing a live person by the time most women have an abortion , the fetus has already gotten a heartbeat wich means it is living ... i consider it murder ... if a person dont want there baby , put it up 4 adoption and b more careful!
2007-04-10 07:32:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
it is a personal choice for each woman to live with for the rest of her life and not anyone elses place to tell that person what to do with her body
2007-04-10 07:31:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Saint Lucipher 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Check spell you words.Yahoo has that option.Why hurry to end up looking foolish?
2007-04-10 07:49:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by mukwathagicu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋