I am having trouble finding a benchmark list that includes 6100 and seperate video cards. Is it better than Fx 5500? FX 5200? Radeon 9550? Radeon 9200? Even though the core speed is much higher at 425 MHz I am betting it doesn't perform as well as an AGP card at 250/300 MHz.
2007-04-08 18:33:33 · 4 answers · asked by rb_tech 3 in Computers & Internet ➔ Hardware ➔ Other - Hardware
Nvidia 6100 only runs on 2 pixel pipelines. It sucks in 3D graphics. Fx5500 and ATI 9550 have 4 pixel pipelines and therefore perform better in games.
2007-04-13 00:41:17 · answer #1 · answered by Karz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not really sure but AGP is slowly going away. Many motherboards come with PCI Express which offers much better speeds than AGP can offer.
2007-04-08 18:39:01 · answer #2 · answered by dc1984us 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Horrible. MAYBE 5200. Core speed means nothing unless you're compare the same core.
2007-04-08 20:40:13 · answer #3 · answered by Kasey C 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
merely change vista to classic mode and eliminate the widget bar and disable the blunders reporting provider and laptop window supervisor provider that would decrease ram utilization by potential of 200-300MB
2016-10-21 10:01:33 · answer #4 · answered by troesch 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋