we should just take this thug out it is easy enough if the libs would not have us fighting with one hand tied behind our back...and follow up with eliminating the unelected leader for life of Iran and all his followers, they are uncivilized men who would like to eliminate or oppress all those that oppose them, the same liberals that will not allow our troops to fight this war in the most logical way should be dropped off in Iran to see how brutal a society they are, are you a homosexual? it is legal to hunt down and murder you, female? be prepared to be denied an education or other privileges you are accustomed too, Jewish? you are not allowed in this nation or many other nations such as Saudi Arabia, christian? you have a high probability of being murdered and you can only worship in private, pacifist? you will be oppressed or worse.Do we want as!@#$#$%@#@oles like this to have nuke weapons? liberals just do not get it, appeasement has been a historical failure as has isolationism...wake up liberals or 50 or a hundred years from now you will be overrun and eliminated, I support our president and troops 100% screw pelosi.
2007-04-08 18:39:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
If the United States Government, 1000+ defense contractors, and big oil, wanted to end the war, they could easily employ the CIA to finish of the job. How? By replacing those who speak and many listen (the Clerics) and I mean not out right kill them but overthrow them (without being "involved") over a span of a couple years. Its pretty much what they did with Iran in the 50's look up Operation Ajax.
Trust me you dont give enough credit to the Government, they know exactly down to the last bullet what is going on, they are on top of things while we believe we are losing. Why? Because there is still money to be made, oil to be leeched, etc.
2007-04-09 01:37:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Since the beginning of the war, Sadr City has been off limits to our forces, ordered by the Iraqi government. That is where his HQ was.
With this recent surge they were told to change the rules of engagement or they could do their own fighting. Since we can now go into Sadr City, we'll get him soon.
See "truth be told", it wasn't a choice Bush could make. It was forced on us by the Iraqis
2007-04-09 01:37:05
·
answer #3
·
answered by Kye H 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
.....and bedwetting libs want to know WHY we're still in Iraq?
How long before Blosie O'Douchebag wants to kiss his hairy ***?
Y'know, If I were Bush, I'd be thinking,"These people hate me no matter what I do; even if I always put down the toilet seat after I use it everyone in this country hates me.....F**K IT! (picks up red phone) "Listen carefully....I'm ordering continuous bombing raids on Iraq, Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and if the Saudis so much as sneeze, add them to the list too, and don't let up until we get ALL of the terrorists......yeah....that's what I said.....Pakistan too.....I know they're our allies, but they still have terrorist camps on their side of the border....This needs to be done while we still have funding, this will end everything quickly.....and by the way, have Sean Penn and Rosie O'Donnell rounded up and sent to Guantenamo Bay. Thank you" (puts down phone) Well, if they hate me for all this, what's one more thing to hate me for?"
Allow me to add to this: Muqtada is calling for the death of U.S. soldiers. The Dems, by trying to cut funding, are also-in an indirect way-calling for the deaths of U.S. soldiers by trying to cut off funding for supplies they need to do their jobs. Further proof that it is becoming difficult to tell a democrat from a terrorist.
2007-04-09 01:38:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Tiberius 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
The PC libs? Are you INSANE or just ignorant. Al Sadr has been a thorn in our side ever since the invasion began, back when THE REPUBLICANS CONTROLLED CONGRESS. Nothing was done about him then, and it was galling, because he was calling for death to Americans. He's been doing it for 4 years. The fact is, George Bush is THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF. It is HIS job to run the war. The PC libs you whine about have nothing to do with Bush's failure to go after Al Sadr. It's just one of the countless bad decisions he has made in this war.
2007-04-09 01:26:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by truth be told 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
Roger that. Lets get back to real war fighting, Screw this police action crap. Anyone in the way is fair game.
2007-04-09 01:27:24
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
We attacked him
For years his Militia, which is by far the largest in Iraq has been on the sidelines waiting forus to leave. He is a major part of Mahlikis Coalition, without him the Government may collapse, as Parlimentary Governments do.
Bombing more Mosques sounds like another Republican solution.
2007-04-09 01:26:29
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Yes! A very large one.
2007-04-09 01:35:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by deedee2qu 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
I agree! he needs to be locked away or wanted dead or alive,even bleeding bad would do
2007-04-09 07:30:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
you are calling for the death of others your self, should you be on someones hit list?
Does he do it for no reason? is he just a crazy madman with no logic? honestly ask yourself and think for a moment.
If you really cared about "right" you would not be a part of the killing. You cannot seperate yourself from your tribe.
2007-04-09 01:28:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋