ABSOLUTELY. This is the first time in a while that America has a Candidate that will put AMERICAN CITIZENS and THEIR INTERESTS first and NOT SELL OUT to ILLEGAL ALIENS and GLOBAL CORPORATIONS!
There will NEVER be a North American Union with TOM TANCREDO in OFFICE!
You will NEVER hear TOM TANCREDO promising Latin America that he will try to pass "Comprehensive Immigration Reform" like that TRAITOR Bush just did.
TOM TANCREDO would only sign a trade deal if it helped AMERICAN WORKERS unlike all these trade deals that have destroyed our manufacturing base. IE NAFTA. Tom Opposes the NAFTA Superhighway and CAFTA.
I have met Tom before in NH where Miguel Cruz from the Hispanic American anti- Illegal Immigration group "You Don't Speak for Me" gave him the biggest hug I have ever seen.
At a fundraiser for Tom in Massachusetts the other day there was a large number of Taiwanese- Americans there. I have seen people of all races, creeds and colors at some of Tom's events.
We as Americans who support TOM all want the same thing: Stop ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION,the Selling out of AMERICA Workers, NO BI-LINGUAL AMERICA and LOWER TAXES.
I will do whatever I can to get TOM TANCREDO elected. I have NEVER been so PROUD in my life to promote a candidate like TOM TANCREDO!
America needs TOM TANCREDO more than ever.
http://www.teamtancredo.org/
Check out how he stands on issues and I'm sure you will like his stance on them.
2007-04-08 23:12:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by 4437 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't see why not, he stands firm on the illegal immigration issue just like Hunter and Paul do. Tancredo makes sense because he knows that if he holds on to the issue I mentioned before, he has nothing to lose and alot to gain. Heck, he just might run a third party campaign in 08 if he's not on the GOP ticket (probably for the Constitution Party). I'd vote for any of these men if they make the ticket but I really support Paul and Tancredo running a third party campaign by forming a unity ticket between the Libertarian and Constitution parties. I don't know if anybody has thought about this but I think this idea has a greater chance of doing well than if they ran an independent candidacy. Thanks!
2007-04-08 18:24:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The last I heard, 17 or 18 people WERE going to vote for him (close family relatives); 4 or 5 others MIGHT vote for him (distant relatives), & 1 or 2 passers-by were Undecided. All the rest of us have absolutely NO CLUE who he is. :)Depending on which of the 3 catagories you fall into- may factor into how well the word gets out about what sense he makes. So let's "hear it"- for Tom Tancredo!
2007-04-08 18:19:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joseph, II 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know enough about him other than he's from Colorado. I assume he's a conservative. That's great when it comes to immigration issues, but I would have to research his past and stands on other issues before making a decision. I think Fred Thompson will enter the race and may take the nomination. Rudy will fade, as will McCain. Romney may stick around because he raised big bucks, but he's already made a few slips of the tongue as the "lifelong hunter". Tancredo needs lots of money to contend. As of now, I don't see it.
2007-04-08 19:41:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by gone 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tom Tancredo scares human beings... because of the fact he feels no could conceal his ideals and convictions. i've got yet to fulfill a real conservative that doesn't like him, yet you're suitable... i think of lots of individuals who could help him are going to leap on the bandwagon of whoever the "well-known" conservative nominee is. i think of the negativity interior the click will harm his opportunities. The question isn't how conservatives or liberals will vote... we already understand that. The question is how the UNDECIDEDS will vote - and all of the claims of racism and bigotry against him will sway many that are uncertain of their stance and convictions first of all. no longer something greater risky than an uninformed voter. in case you don't understand the applicants, do us all a prefer and the two get knowledgeable or stay dwelling house. yet... he does have MY vote.
2016-10-21 10:00:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by troesch 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he would be a good choice but I havn't made up my mind yet. I need to learn more about all candidates. If he IS the candidate I think he would do a very good job and I would not hesitate to vote for him.
Originally I was hoping Guiliani would be the candidate but now I am wavering. That is why I won't make a decision so early on.
2007-04-08 21:58:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
He doesn't have the credentials to lead a country. The guy is racist for one, and extremely right wing for two. I'm for immigration reform but this guy is a hypocrite who files lockstep with the extreme right wing of the Republican party. You think this administration is bad? I can't imagine how corrupt an administration would be under a smart cronie like Tancredo.
2007-04-08 18:55:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Frank 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
sadly, i wont be of legal boting age in 2008, but i will convince as many people as possible to vote for him. he's the only one out there who has a definite, sensible plan. he's also one of the bravest politicians- he doesn't always worry about being politically correct.
2007-04-09 05:51:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Andrew S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I just might, yes in the general election
But not if he runs against Newt Gingrich in the primary
2007-04-08 18:13:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So far, I like what I've read about him. He does make sense. I plan to do more research before I make up my mind, though.
2007-04-08 18:09:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Eyes 5
·
1⤊
0⤋