I asked this question earlier and received no satisfactory responses. Maybe I can get some now.
I have three main questions for those who believe the government was involved in the planning and execution of 9/11. These are some things that I really don't understand. Maybe you can help me.
If the government did plan and carry out 9/11, this would be the story of the century. Why have no major media outlets put any serious attention to this story?
If there is so much scientific evidence to support the idea that the government's story is not possible, why are there no articles published in respectable peer-reviewed journals in chemistry, physics, or engineering about this topic?
What is the motive? Why did the government do it?
2007-04-08
17:35:42
·
9 answers
·
asked by
msi_cord
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Last time I received 20 responses. 18 of those responses either called CT people stupid, incapable of independent/logical thought, or stated that I would never get a response. 1 babbled on about PNAC, but failed to provide responses to any of the questions and the other told me to ask China because they clearly know all about what happened on 9/11 because they have all the evidence.
2007-04-08
17:40:34 ·
update #1
Celeste,
I will wait patiently for some good answers.
2007-04-08
17:41:46 ·
update #2
Turbo,
SP's huh? Think I have heard that somewhere, maybe Mr. O'Reilly.
2007-04-08
17:46:19 ·
update #3
Celeste,
I have read all the PNAC stuff and am not sure where you are going there. The major media outlets you are citing are CNN/Time Warner, ABC/Disney, CBS/Viacom, NBC, and FOX. These outlets have a variety of political affiliations and I cannot believe that one of them would not pick up a story this huge. Think of the profit that could be made by airing this story, definitely more than what you can ever get paid off.
Also, I am aware that there are professors and scientists that "believe" the 9/11 conspiracy. Why have they not published a single journal article in any of the major scientific journals? It doesn't make any sense. If there were true scientific evidence to support their claims, it would be in a journal.
2007-04-08
17:52:56 ·
update #4
Plumber and austingirl,
You both fail to answer any of the questions presented.
2007-04-08
17:55:11 ·
update #5
yabah,
I thank you for your answer as a devil's advocate. I would say the third point you make is their strongest (and only) point. I personally cannot believe that none of the media outlets would print or report a story of this magnitude if there was sufficient evidence to support it. I have been able to find no article in any respectable scientific journal to support the CT view. There may very well be scientists who think this may be the case, but they clearly do not believe it strongly enough to try to get something printed, except for on CT websites.
2007-04-08
17:58:57 ·
update #6
elgam,
Oh, I forgot that the Jews own everything, my mistake. Moron.
2007-04-08
17:59:56 ·
update #7
1. (Devil's advocate here) I think the government (and perhaps rightly so) would put the kaibosh on any major media outlets doing a story on this. That said, I think alot of major media outlets would be afraid to air / publish a story like this because of fear of backlash from listeners / viewers / readers of both parties...simply because it would likely be meet with the same reactions as you got the first time you posed this question.
2. Are you sure no such papers exist (in peer-reviewed journals) ?? I'm not saying there are...But I'd be surprised if there's not. I DO know a professor at BYU in Utah was almost fired for actively voicing his opinions on 9/11...most of which were CT type stuff. You also need to realize that these papers are written by working professors. Professors with REAL lives, and REAL families. The University employers of any professor who had an CT paper published would be VERY upset. It would bring ALOT of heat onto the University and thus, the professor. I think alot of professors are worried of losing their credibility, AND their jobs.
3. This is the biggest issue for the CT groups. The only answer CT people have is that the government felt the losses were worth the gains in engaging this country in a long term war effort, which would be rewarded with access to oil, land, and foreign markets (and thus more influence in the middle east area). These are all very strategically important in a financial and national security sense.
That said, I definitely do NOT think our own government caused 9/11. Rosie O'Donnell is truly a nutcase.
2007-04-08 17:50:16
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Rumsfeld Freudian slip, quick video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFuUGEZ39g8
Now, why would they lie? Many reasons, money...restructuring of world political powers the more you look into the "conspiracy"...the more obvious it becomes. Have you ever seen the collapse of WTC 7? It shouldn't have happened. Why did Bush block an investigation for a full year, by that time we already at war with the guilty. Why are questions met with so much resistance from the white house? Why do we spend $65-80 million investigating Clinton's sexual indiscretions and only $3 million initially and eventually $14 million total to investigate the deaths of 3,000 Americans? The news media is basically owned by a handful of people in the US, with a vested interest in pushing certain facts. I encourage you to look into this for yourself, go to www.st911.org, check out a couple documentaries.
Here is a doc put out by the families of WTC victims:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9IHgFwYeB-Y
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
--Hermann Goering(1893-1946) Commander-in-Chief of the Luftwaffe, President of the Reichstag, Prime Minister of Prussia and, as Hitler's designated successor, the second man in the Third Reich.
EDIT: Here is an MIT Engineer and Research scientist discussing the collapse
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Son0BWduQx4&NR=1
2007-04-08 17:50:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6
·
4⤊
4⤋
first , the government have tons of motives to carry out the attack ----i mean some elements in the gov. Cheney and his gang---u can read their project the new American century.
all the media is owned by 4 major cop.---all CNN-NBC-fox-times -ABC are owned by very generous donors and patriots to AIPAC---- this corp--also owners the arms industry so they have double motive the sale money $$$ and Israel------they can not do anything against the official story CRAP----or the reporter will be gone and will never make it to air
there is tons of professors and scientists who went public and got smeared and attacked and also threatened.
motives is the oil resources is about to be dryed up-----they need to be in the M.East----2 month before 911 --our gov tried to strike a deal here in washington with taliban regarding a pipe line to go across their land---negotiation failed ---they wanted a new pearl harbor event to mobleize us and support them to protect us from the boggieman ---for them 3000 americans is a cheap price for all the gains and worl wide control------
2007-04-08 17:39:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by hellary 2
·
4⤊
6⤋
The gov used it as a pretext for military intervention.
They own all the media...t.v. and mags.
2007-04-08 18:03:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ugly Betty 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
This is an easy one...It's called "Blame America First" The SP's and leftists just can't deal with the fact that an ETHINIC group is responsible for such chaos....So they said: "Hey, let's blame Bush and take the attention away from the murderous Islamo-facists."
2007-04-08 17:44:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
5⤋
Chicken s@#t media, Look up gulf of tonkin, pearl harbor, lusitania, all us government created to further their agenda. Motive is oil, and big business, halliburton, carlyle group.Go and look up all the evidence and make your own decision.
2007-04-08 17:46:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by masterplumber75 4
·
4⤊
4⤋
have we ever gotten the whole story on the JFK slaughter?this administartion was hell bent on going in to the middle east no matter what!that the public would go blindly along for the ride was a big mistake on there part.just do a little reading into the whole subject and you will find out,ill start you off with one .an iraqi defector named curve ball should help.
2007-04-08 17:50:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
6⤋
purplish books ????? do u know who owns or the publishers are---they are Jews----
u asking for motives ??? where are u in the world ---there is like 1000 motive ----choose ur pick
2007-04-08 17:58:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
Please take the time and click on to this link and you will have the answers to all of your questions!!!
http://www.exodus2006.com/9_11PNAC.htm
Much information!!
2007-04-08 18:04:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋