Questions about 9/11?

Question

I have three main questions for those who believe the government was involved in the planning and execution of 9/11. These are some things that I really don't understand. Maybe you can help me.

If the government did plan and carry out 9/11, this would be the story of the century. Why have no major media outlets put any serious attention to this story?

If there is so much scientific evidence to support the idea that the government's story is not possible, why are there no articles published in respectable peer-reviewed journals in chemistry, physics, or engineering about this topic?

What is the motive? Why did the government do it?

Ohbrother, looks like I am getting the same types of responses. Guess they can't answer questions that don't fit into their talking points.

conx,

You do make some good points. Bush has definitely squandered any opportunity for international cooperation in fighting terrorism with our actions in Iraq.

starts with f,

I asked you to provide respectable peer-reviewed journals in the sciences. The "journal of 911 studies .com" does not count as a scientific journal.

A list of respectable peer-reviewed journals would be any journal printed by an institution of science that is reviewed by its peers. Some great examples would be the Journal of Physics, Physics Today, Scientific America, Journal of Chemistry, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Journal of Metallurgy, almost anything you would find in a university library.

Your PNAC argument is yet another convenient way to not answer the real question at hand. Why did the government do it? I know about PNAC and wonder if you are just using this as it is nothing more than a part of the basic talking points set up for you to "prove" government involvement.

You also fail to provide any evidence that the media is or can be bought off or intimidated as you suggest.

Answer 1

Great Question!

And, as usual, no responses from the "Conspiracy Fantasy" folks among us!

They seem to prefer hit and run tactics where they are not in a position where they have to provide credible sources for their fantasies. They fear honest debate...because rhetoric and twisted logic don't do well when challenged by scientific data and common sense.

Answer 2

specific I even have some strategies. Why do they shop doing 9/11 memorials each 365 days (6 years now) and teach it survive television for 4 hours on various channels? in my view, i think of it in basic terms prolongs the grieving technique and the victims families/friends will on no account heal because of this and the memorials in basic terms brings lower back the trauma. Why do not they only supply up doing the memorials on stay television and supply up showing names and photos of the deceased, shouldn't that be a private determination for the victims families? of direction, we are going to constantly undergo in strategies 9/11 however the stay memorials do not help and it form of feels like the memorial forces itself onto people who in basic terms desire to circulate on. 6 years is in basic terms way too long to do stay 9/11 memorials. absolutely everyone agree?

Answer 3

Well, the bushies have wrecked our stance in the eyes of the world and squandered an opportunity to unite the entire civilized world in a concerted effort to fight terrorism, but of course he made a right turn and attacked a country that had nothing to do with the 9/11 attack. With that said, I, being a godless liberal democrat , cannot blame bush for the attack...I can blame him for the response since, but not the attack itself. He and his cronies just aren't that smart to put all that together. That evil did take a master mind's thinking. It wasn't nice, but it was well thought out and effectively took advantage of our weaknesses....

Answer 4

Let's start with the easiest one.

What is the motive? Why did the government do it?

Obviously you are not familiar with pnac.

I'm still waiting for you to explain all you know about pnac.

Okay, since you have no answer for the first, how about the second?

"If there is so much scientific evidence to support the idea that the government's story is not possible, why are there no articles published in respectable peer-reviewed journals in chemistry, physics, or engineering about this topic?"

These people don't exist in your universe?

"Why have no major media outlets put any serious attention to this story?"

bushbots are always whining the media is controled by an elite group pf people...like they wouldn't be easy enough to intimidate/buy off.

Provide your list of what you in your opinion constitutes "respectable peer-reviewed journals".


msi you have totally ignored the pnac question. Why is that?

If you have read about pnac, then you know the motivation. Why so obtuse?

Answer 5

Ask China, they have the evidence !!
But a little knowledge of how buildings are built, helps. Including the fact that the architect planned for accidental plane crashes, tower 7 going down on its own, yet venezuelan towers buring for over a day and never fell, etc..
There is so much UNPROVEN evidence, that only China can really PROVE how it was done, they have all the pieces !!

Answer 6

Ah, conspiracy theory. And I shot Kennedy. Got one better.
Would we have had 9/11 if President Clinton would have done something after Bin Laden claimed the responsibility for the truck bombs in the garages of the trade centers, or maybe after the USS Cole, also Bin Laden's and maybe after the US Embassy attack. But wait, we're talkin Bush conspiracy.

Answer 7

I'm curious to see who and how many answers you get. I asked a similar question several weeks ago and only one out of 19 answers was a C.T. and it was a non- answer

Answer 8

Since all the conspiracy people took their meds and are asleep right now, do not expect answers til we unlock their cages in the morning. TY

The asylum management

Answer 9

Well there you go again, your asking liberals to present facts.

Islomofascists, tear down that wall!

Good question by the way.

Answer 10

Hey you make sense! How is that fair! You got the tin foil hat crowd in a tizzy!