Will the war in Iraq end when the British and American and other countries leave?

Answer 1

i can say before the American invasion of us on Iraq there were no inside war but after they won the war the inside war have started with the conquer and when they will leave the war will complete

Answer 2

It seems hard to imagine that scenario. The invasion prompted everything in its wake. Hussein, monster that he was, led a fairly stable Iraq. If the so-called coalition had thought about organizing and backing a coup instead, history would paint Dubya as a great leader. Not much chance of that happening now.

But seriously, there are many long-standing issues between the Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds that cannot be resolved overnight. Even though I think the US and Britain should leave--now--it is not going to get better for a long time.

Answer 3

The war as we know it will end. However the tragedy of Iraq would have not been averted. If we leave it will be full fledged genocide. Persian vs. Arab. The United States People, regardless of intention, are responsible for this war. We approved, we watched it like a sport on TV. We even cheered when "major combat operations ended" Now as soon as that war hit our pocket books it's time to leave. Man up America, Man up and pay up, if you were against this war when it started you should have done more to stop it...Too late now, we have to push through and it will be expensive...

Answer 4

the actuality is Gordon Brown does not supply a rattling approximately his components. He did no longer have self assurance in the conflict, yet signed as much because it because of the fact he needed potential. He has bankrupted the rustic and the British forces have run brief of troops and kit. they're additionally low on ethical, because of the fact there is an entire loss of political management. they are actually not being advised what it fairly is they're meant to be doing. the yank administation has a distinctive subject to the British. Britain in ordinary terms went in as united statesa.'s best chum and because Tony Blair believed he exchange into on a challenge from God. Tony Blair has considering the fact that run away and the British human beings have been continuously against the conflict. That makes it politically hassle-free to withdraw. Obama needs to withdraw with a minimal of the pretence of having completed some thing. that is going to be incredibly complicated. united statesa. has no longer in ordinary terms destabilised Iraq, however the completed area. united statesa. has additionally politicised the reconstruction of Iraq which exchange into an insane factor to do. American companies could withdraw properly earlier the troops, so as that the Iraq's could have some self assurance that they are going to be allowed to run their own affairs.

Answer 5

No, there is a civil war going on between the Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds. Throw Al Quada into the mix too. Probably other groups there also.

Answer 6

No, because it is a war not between factions of different groups of Iraqis. But between those who want to settle differences using terrorist tactics and violence and those who want to settle differences by violence.

If the terrorist win. Iraq will become like Lebanon, or the Palestinian territories. A wasteland where various terrorist groups spend their time killing each other.

Answer 7

Not at all. That's only the beginning. We leave--iran steps in.. The next thing you know we will be in probably the 3rd world war. If we don't end this terror bulls/h/i/t/ right there, we will be fighting in your backyard in the not too distant future!

Answer 8

I believe, even long after Iraq forms some type of representative government, they will still have sporadic terrorist outbursts, simply because radical Islam won't die until all the radical Islamists are gone.

Answer 9

1500 yrs. of Shiite and Sunni animosity over who should have been Mohammeds successor would kind of point to No.

Answer 10

Sure will. Muqtada al Sadr will end it