English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Some people are telling me that it would not be "appropriate" for Barbie to have nipples....well why not Ken?

2007-04-08 12:20:54 · 28 answers · asked by ηєvєrmorє 6 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

28 answers

He does........they are pierced and he has that tattoo of his gay lover on his chest also

2007-04-08 12:23:26 · answer #1 · answered by Nagitar™ 7 · 3 0

Good question! Perhaps they don't put nipples on Ken because if Ken had them and Barbie didn't have any, little girls just might grow up thinking there was something wrong with them.
If Barbie had nipples she would then be considered a sexual being, therefore putting her at risk of being kidnapped from her owner to be fantasized about.
Then again if both of the dolls were made with a darkened pigment where the nipples should be, both Ken and Barbie would be considered sexual beings only because the dolls are 'grown up' and not childlike.
Hmmm...

2007-04-08 12:33:06 · answer #2 · answered by Amber 3 · 1 0

Ken doesn't have nipples because he got in a freak accident and remained nippleless. Maybe Mattel realized that men really don't need nipples, so they made him...that way.

2007-04-08 12:24:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Well if Barbie can't be anatomically correct, maybe Ken can't be either? Or the designer was afraid it would look like two giant moles taking over his chest.

2007-04-08 12:23:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Well if Ken had em then Barbie would have to. You could draw some on if you are that upset by it...

2007-04-08 12:24:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

they should make the barbie dolls clothes sewed to the barbie were kids can't take them off

imagine walking in your 4 year old cousins room with a 3 foot naked barbie doll.

2007-04-08 12:24:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

men dont need nipples anyway, so why bother making them on Ken

2007-04-08 12:23:51 · answer #7 · answered by Cuppycake♥ 6 · 1 0

i guess it would be the same reason why Ken doesn't have his man parts and Barbie is without a va-jay-jay.

2007-04-08 12:26:57 · answer #8 · answered by ♥sista 5 · 1 0

Because little five year-old girls would bite them off, chew on them, then choke to death...also, America was colonized by repressed, persecuted puritans who thought nipples were of the *Devil*.

2007-04-08 12:24:26 · answer #9 · answered by Gay Man 2 · 1 0

The same reason why Barbie doesn't.

2007-04-08 12:22:50 · answer #10 · answered by I Am A French Fry 2 · 3 0

Ummm, there are other things missing on Ken, too!

2007-04-08 12:23:46 · answer #11 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers