So, what is your take on this question and why?
2007-04-08 12:14:30 · 9 answers · asked by Gypsy Gal 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He should be 35, legally.
But otherwise, the president should be at whatever age, so long as they have integrity, leadership, charisma, and can lead the country into prosperity and growth.
.....
So I'd say 40.
2007-04-08 12:18:01 · answer #1 · answered by cnipurphin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think it matters. There are so many factors that are more important.
However generally I think about at least 50 years old. I like the older men -- or women -- generally because they have more experience and that generally is a good thing.
Reagan's health was failing him and he should not have run for a third term even if the Constitution allowed it. As good as he was, it was time for someone new.
2007-04-08 19:18:27 · answer #2 · answered by John16 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
27
2007-04-08 19:18:19 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Irrelevant.
2007-04-08 19:17:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
About the same age as Barack Obama.
2007-04-08 19:17:25 · answer #5 · answered by Muscat 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
50...i dont want a pres with alzteimers
2007-04-08 19:17:30 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't care about his age. His IQ is more important. Right now we have a total moron for a Pres.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u794cJ_u6BU
2007-04-08 19:18:15 · answer #7 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
not too old to know the difference between quail and human when shooting a gun..
2007-04-08 21:05:22 · answer #8 · answered by I race cars 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well i'm 47, so i say 47.
2007-04-08 19:16:32 · answer #9 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋