Ex:
Forged Uranium document
Plame outing
2007-04-08 09:48:37 · 26 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
rock (below) Here's the evidence. Does it change anyting?
http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1205&Issue=Disclosure+of+CIA+Agent+Identity
http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2005/7/13/04720/9340
2007-04-08 10:04:34 · update #1
yes. But they won't be.
2007-04-08 09:50:44 · answer #1 · answered by Gary W 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I think that every President should be watched like a hawk. It is the only real control we have on keeping the powers that be in check. Bill Clinton was a very personable president, very nearly as good as Reagan at public speaking. As such the perception was that they were both better than they were. Bush on the other hand is a very poor public speaker, especially in off-the-cuff remarks so it's easier to throw mud on his character and have more success in getting some to stick.
Back to the main point though Keep a strong eye on all of them because they are in a position to save or ruin us all. Contrary to what others might say I don't believe that power corrupts, but I do believe that power attracts corruptible people.
2007-04-08 17:02:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, only liberal traitors want that. As for Plame, she was a desk jockey with her name on a parking space at CIA headquarters and a CIA sticker on her car. She even posed for the cover of Vanity Fair magazine. To say she was under cover is a joke, and a lie, but liberal traitors never cared about the truth. Their hatred for president Bush trumps all in their little minds. Now be a good little liberal and go ask Screaming Dean for his new list of lies, and ask him to make the next list a little better than the pathetic ones he has been giving you.
Forged documents? I'd have to ask Dan Rather about that. He's the expert.
2007-04-08 17:23:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, Bush should be impeached, but the idea of that happening is nearly zero. Though we have to try. Look into the website I list below. It says in the website that he has done all these things listed:
Illegal War, Illegal Spying, Geneva Convention Violations, Illegal Detention, Illegal Release of Classified Information, Illegal Freezing of Accounts and Restriction to Freedom of Assembly, and Illegal Use of Signing Statements. There is also a petition you can sign to give to your Representative and one that you can send yourself to put pressure on the government to do something about impeaching him. Please go to this website:
http://impeachforpeace.org
2007-04-08 22:16:28 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't feel they need to be impeached.
I also didn't think Clinton needed to be impeached for going on a national campaign claiming he didn't have sex with 'that woman.' Nor do I think he needed to be impeached for lying to the Grand Jury - several times.
However there should be investigations that are made public without limiting or editing the material claiming it's always a matter of national security.
OUR F*ing security deals with us. OUR government owes it to us to report back to us as such.
2007-04-08 17:05:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
To what possible end? He bought the election in the first place! He OWNS the Courts! About all we can do is Hope Congress and the Senate stop him from doing anymore damage and cheer when he leaves office. AND Thank You Lord, the times a comin!
2007-04-08 16:54:40 · answer #6 · answered by John R 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, I heard one Republican Senator say on TV I believe he should impeached. I'm sure 50 % think Dubya should be gone but they hate to admit it, because of their party obligations. to the party that thinks I'm a Brain Surgeon , my diagnosis of you , you should make a appt. if you like to see Troops come home in a casket and maimed beyond recognition. By the way have you joined up are you sitting behind that computer spewing hate just like that sorry President that you elected .
2007-04-08 16:54:26 · answer #7 · answered by Nicki 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I think it is in poor judgment to impeach the President while our nation is at war.
I also think it won't happen, because too many Democrats will be implicated in the process (including *cough* Billary).
2007-04-08 17:17:17 · answer #8 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes and for the torture chambers covered by the new War Act but nabbing people w/o being charged(is that why Habeus Corpus retracted)?
2007-04-08 16:56:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
>>Yes, let's get them all. Maybe we should start preparing now for an impeachment of our next president too.
2007-04-08 16:52:08 · answer #10 · answered by Yahoogirl 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
why would we want to impeach the second beast president we have ever had just because you spineless libs say so be for you start running down our commander and chef you better look in your Owen back yared
2007-04-08 17:09:56 · answer #11 · answered by Dennis 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋