2007-04-08 03:41:28 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Victory in war does not align with their political agenda. It is all about compromise at any cost to the U.S.
2007-04-08 03:47:06 · answer #1 · answered by meathead 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Setting a date for pullout of US troops in Iraq is not a "liberal concept of victory." It is a pragmatic admission of defeat, something that Bush, Cheney and company refuse to acknowledge. It's time to end this debacle and bring home the soldiers, marines, airmen, and sailors whose lives are being sacrificed for a lost cause.
2007-04-08 12:02:58 · answer #2 · answered by Misanthrope 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
VICTORY? How do the libs know that a specific date in the future is going to be the right day for withdrawal? Military geniuses. It is the most ignorant, thoughtless, dangerous thing they could have come up with.
If they wanted the troops home, that is what they would have asked for. Congress is full of immature cowards; they a disgrace at this time!
2007-04-08 10:49:33 · answer #3 · answered by thewindywest 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Based on the answers I see here, victory is not a liberal concept.
2007-04-08 11:07:14 · answer #4 · answered by Shrink 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It isn't about the war in iraq folks.
Liberals are only interested in getting control of congress and the whitehouse and are using the war as a means to get there.
Once there, they won't give a darn about the people of iraq or anywhere else.
It will be business as usual for them doing all they can to turn our free republic into another failure of socialism.
It is ONLY about getting and keeping power in the wealthiest country in the world. They are the political class and that is all they are concerned about, to the detriment of America and the world.
2007-04-08 10:49:08 · answer #5 · answered by cappi 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Do you seriously think that the conflict (not WAR; we won the war in 2003, remember?) in Iraq will end in victory for anyone involved?
Thousands of Iraqi citizens are dead; thousands of international and US troops are dead; the ensuing civil war ensures that thousands of more people will die.
Victory? Nay; a travesty.
2007-04-08 10:54:06 · answer #6 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No it is called facing the reality that there can be no military victory in Iraq. Facing reality - what a concept, maybe we should try it.
2007-04-08 10:51:34 · answer #7 · answered by ash 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
How can one have a victory in a illegal and unjust war?
Was Hitlers conquest of Poland and France during WW2 a "Victory"?
2007-04-08 10:49:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Then endless war must be the conservative definition of victory.
2007-04-08 10:57:26 · answer #9 · answered by Crabboy4 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Is bombing innocent people, destroying their infrastructure, murdering hundreds of thousands of their people, including children, causing millions who can to flee, and allowing your friends to steal billions from the u.s. treasury the republican concept of liberating people? Doing good?
2007-04-08 10:49:39 · answer #10 · answered by cassandra 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋