English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok, I've read some facts said about findings of a crashed UFO sight in some open field along time ago. Where scientists actually found burned grass where the creator was left my the harsh landing. This is the first sign of an actual ufo blowing up into small pieces of some sort of medal unknown material that they sent to a lab to further identify. the medal was mothing of this Earth for sure, and could not bend, dent, scratch, drill, melt, etc. it as as if it was indistructable, except when it hit the ground with such a magnitude of force. They don't even know to this day, what type of material this was, or where it came from, the Government took the body remains to an undercover lab to analyse it but none of our most powerful machines can determine the type of anatomy these beings have or how they function, there skin in impenetrable, and cold grey colored as a dead human would look and feel clamy. thier eyes are Large Glossy Black, Thin arms, Fat Fingers, small mouth. YOUR OPINION?

2007-04-08 03:37:09 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

12 answers

What you read is not true. There is no physical evidence of any alien craft landing or crashing on the earth.

2007-04-08 03:43:32 · answer #1 · answered by Gene 7 · 1 1

I can tell you this. UFOs are depicted on ancient caves. The bible speaks of strange shapes in the sky. Ancient Indian text tell of battles in the sky and describe perfectly what it is like going up into space. The middle ages show UFOs in the background of some paintings along with a recorded event of the sky being full of round glowing objects. In July 1952, about 7 objects drove the Air Force crazy as they appeared over Washington D.C. for about a week. They were seen and photographed, were on Radar, and jets intercepted them more than once. The movie, The Day The Earth Stood Still was inspired by that event. Astronauts have reported Bogie's while in space and at least once used the word Aliens out side the ship before they scrambled the signal. Astronauts Mitchell and Cooper have came out publicly and said there are alien life forms. Cooper said a saucer landed in sight of him on a X-15 test sight and then took off a short time later. You have to remember, they could be a thousand years ahead of us or even a million. We would be as bugs to be examined in that case. They would be capable of doing god-like things.

2007-04-11 06:14:01 · answer #2 · answered by Dutch 4 · 0 1

Yes, sounds like you are referencing Roswell, where an extraterrestrial space craft crashed. Your primary question,(speculation only): A UFO likely could not cruise around in our atmosphere at 10x so you must mean through space?

It would, by our standard, have to be protected from matter.
I think we use rubber, or some other substrate, to absorb impact rather than repelling and/or moving debris in the pathway. You have actually stumbled upon something of interest, being: Man does not like to be embarrassed. So puny little minds reject the fact of a UFO because man does not know how it could possibly be done so, hence - ergo - it can't be done. UFOs may be debunked precisely because of that reason, an admission that man is not at the top of the intellectual food chain; already we have people who "count" on the space people helping us, that could be expanded, by official acknowledgment of inferiority, to include actual worshiping of Aliens, being a reachable, tenable, God. This would erode the power base of the monkeys in charge, (i.e., That would be baaaaaddd, cause people would say to our govt. "What do you know, you can't travel through interstellar space, but they can, so we will supplicate to them, worship).

Like the UFOs that appeared over the Capital, which is kinda hard to deny that happened, so they lampoon Roswell, which also may have happened. Focus on the ones they don't want to talk about. The UFOs departed when interceptors were sent, and then returned when the interceptors left, yeah that was swamp gas, or thermal inversion alright, uh huh.

I have seen an IFO, being an extraterrestrial space craft, in daylight from no less than 100 ft away. One thing I noticed was that it had a grainy fuzziness about it, as if it was ensconced within some type of field emanation.

I will defer to reach for an explanation because you never know who may be reading these posts.

2007-04-08 04:23:46 · answer #3 · answered by Raymond 1 · 0 2

before each and everything, you state you've self assurance "flying saucers's are authentic." shall we make sparkling. there is absolute self assurance that Unidentified Flying gadgets exist. in case you seem into the sky and be conscious a airplane, that you know is a jet, yet you don't know no matter if that's a 737, L-1011, or another jet, or you don't know what the flight volume is that's an unidentified flying merchandise. . . Now, do you mean via flying saucers a spacecraft that's of no longer of earth foundation, and how can it fly on the speed of sunshine without exploding, that's a countless remember. before each and everything, there is not any VERIFIABLE information that we were visited via extraterrestrials. You state that, "there have been too many sightings for them now to not be authentic." Please do not take this the incorrect way, yet that in and of itself is information of no longer something. evaluate Bigfoot. . . a lot of sightings. . under no circumstances a body. . evaluate Santa clause. Now there are legends of Santa Clause, and each and each and every 365 days, I see a lot of guys that i do not see different situations of the 365 days who more advantageous wholesome the outline of "Santa Clause." Does this mean that there is a authentic Santa Clause who lives on the North Pole and fly's global in a flying sled and resources provides to solid little boys and women? back to the substance on your question. in accordance the conception of particular relativity, no longer something can shuttle faster than the speed of sunshine. (186,282 miles in preserving with second) notwithstanding in case you plug the values into the equation, it supplies outcomes that are meaningless. in accordance to the conception some issues ensue as you attitude the speed of sunshine. First you benefit countless mass. . and time slows down. probably, on the speed of sunshine, time stops. . What fairly occurs? no individual is acquainted with, we've not been able to get there yet. which could now to not say that it's not a threat, yet as our aspect of expertise and technologies stand at present, we are faraway from getting there. wish this facilitates. .

2016-11-27 03:25:45 · answer #4 · answered by stair 4 · 0 0

ever think it may have been a government test of new material. not only that, if the gov took the body to an undercover lab, how would u or anyone else in the outside world know the results. also how would u know how fast the ufo was going. there are many inaccuracies in this ufo/alien discovery and i'm pretty certain it's nothing but a conspiracy theory.

2007-04-08 07:58:01 · answer #5 · answered by StealthShadow 4 · 0 1

If a base ball crashed into the earth at the speed of light it would destroy the earth.
Aliens proliferate throughout the universe but no alien ever has or ever will visit this planet.
Any reports of aliens crashing on earth are just pipe dreams.
The government would never cover up the existence an E.T.
UFOs are another question! he-he!

2007-04-09 03:02:14 · answer #6 · answered by Billy Butthead 7 · 0 1

Facts? Just because someone spins a yarn, does not make it fact.
Your description sounds like a Roswell story. Bunk!

2007-04-08 03:53:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

No crashes yet, plus nothing faster then speed of light.

2007-04-08 16:30:24 · answer #8 · answered by John B 4 · 0 1

All I know is, we have to keep saving their asses from the Replicators. How very inconvenient.

2007-04-08 03:46:24 · answer #9 · answered by rangerbaldwin 4 · 0 1

we are among you now don't worry we are harmless , and we don't all look like that, we come in peace

2007-04-08 03:47:03 · answer #10 · answered by jim m 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers