no the last thing we need is the bush family continuing their legacy
2007-04-08 03:17:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by bluekornfarmer 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
See this is the difference between self serving pricks like the Clinton's and a real family oriented classy family like the Bush's.
Both have had great political success. But the Bush's really wanted to lead not abuse the system for their own benefit.
So the answer is no.
2007-04-08 04:38:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jeb Bush, yes. Laura Bush, no. I think even she would agree that Hilary Clinton is better qualified. Of course, Clinton's policy decisions would be far worse.
2007-04-08 06:40:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by DBm41 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Laura Bush is to days icon that June Clever was on the Leave it to Beaver show many years ago..only diff. is Junes husband wasn't a drunk that we could see anyways
2007-04-08 03:17:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rupert supported Hillary? fairly, thats fairly a information for me. properly, wager fox will help hillary then huh? Oh properly, i wager i will help Hillary then. She's smarter and a career female. Laura is a housewife so i won't be able to believe her in place of work.
2016-11-27 03:23:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by foecking 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, W might be contagious. They're already going to have to burn everything in the White House before the next guy takes office.
2007-04-08 03:14:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by na n 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Noooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
2007-04-08 03:33:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by averilyn06 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, her eyes are too close together, Granny said people like that be tetched in the head.
2007-04-08 03:36:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no. President's wives/brothers/uncles should not be allowed to run regardless of party.
2007-04-08 03:14:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by steve.c_50 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Although I would prefer her to Hillary. she has good values and self respect.
2007-04-08 04:29:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋