They both are for bigger government control of our lives. They are for keeping the poor poor. They want to bring the rich to the poor house. They want us all to beg them for the things they need. If a democrat must win I think the New Mexico Governor would be better than these two.
2007-04-08 03:11:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Fly Boy 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Obama seems to have a heavy progressionism approach to politics. He's a lot about changing the politic system to be better for the country.
Clinton is about the usual democratic ideas as far as I know. Universal healthcare is her big ticket platform.
I like Obama better. I think he has the right approach in that we can make our government better by making things less corruptable.
2007-04-08 09:27:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by imraybarbonifrommiami 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
They are both 'about' furthering their own political aspirations and those of the Democratic Party, which includes socialism, multiculturalism, racism, and political 'correctness'.
Republicans are no better.
Professional politicians are ruining this country. Yet, people will still vote for them.
Time to vote Libertarian or Independent.
2007-04-08 09:27:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Skyhawk 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
Neither of them is about anything but media exposure. I think Bill Richardson should win.
2007-04-08 15:56:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by badkitty1969 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Obama's all about socialism.
Clinton's all about getting elected, and will do or say anything to accomplish that.
2007-04-08 09:30:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Oo, ooo, I know this one. An agricultural question.
Answer: free range chicken farming in the desert?
Personal aggrandizement.
None of the above!!!
2007-04-08 09:29:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wonka 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
this is easy to answer...even for a Brit like me.
it's either the 'first' black, or, 'first' woman president...end of
2007-04-08 09:31:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by chrisbell3 3
·
3⤊
0⤋