Would a hung parliament be a good thing for Britain?

Answer 1

Well, I don't know how it would work out for Britain, but over the past 60 years, Canada has suffered about 7 minority governments (including now) and while they often don't last all that long, some of them have been among the most honest, cooperative and productive governments in the country's history.

(Its so much harder to ram through ignorant, extremist partisan laws, screw 19 year old mistresses and steal the public's money while the opposition in Parliament has the majority......)

Answer 2

I believe that the more any government does, the more it does wrong. Governments are always incompetent or corrupt because politics is a career which attracts warped personalities.

As a hung parliament would probably make it more difficult for government to do anything, it would at least slow down the pace of idiocy. So yes, it would be a good thing for Britain.

Answer 3

Definitely over the last ten years. This Government, with its large majorities, has been able to push through such SIGNIFICANT constitutional changes, that it is tantamount to an abuse of power. No Government is elected to office to hand power over to a foreign entity, and no Government may bind its successor. Which means, that it can't do anything that cannot be undone by a following Government. Because of this, it would have been far more democratic to have had a hung parliament. Notwithstanding this, I am amazed that New Labour has had the right to do some of the things that it has. I think that the Monarch has certain reserve powers to prevent an over powerful Government from behaving unconstitutionally, but clearly they haven't been put into effect.

Answer 4

A hung legislature is good for no country. Nothing gets settled. National governments need to move forward with possible solutions to problems. If those solutions fail, at least that knowledge would enhance government actions and provide an incentive for the other side to try their own remedies. A hung parliament will guarantee that the status quo would remain unchanged.

Answer 5

Would a hung parliament be a good thing for Britain?

Well, Im not sure, but I do doubt you'd hear any complaints from the interns.

Answer 6

Well having never witnessed a hung parliament I'm not sure what one would entail, however, with no party in overall control I assume it would mean the politics of compromise, which could mean (knowing our politicians) that no decisions would every be made. Mmmm, probably excellent news for Britain!

Answer 7

There is nothing wrong with differences of opinions but if a hung Parliament means the Queen would make the decision, I don't know.
You can see from the US politics since the 2000 appointment of George W. Bush as president how much trouble the wrong decisions can get you into. "The Decider" is still terrorizing the world with his mental incompetence.
How strong mentally is your Queen ?

Answer 8

Are you kidding? It would mean the Lib-Dem's and Labour would form a coalition government. Hell, that'd be worse than Labour on its own.
The Liberals getting their greasy mitts on power would be a very bad thing. When was the last time they came up with a serious set of policies that would work? They've been so long out of power I'm confident they wouldn't have the foggiest what to do if they formed a coalition. All their policies are idealistic and PC and oh so lefty and have no real bearing on real life, but no one really minds now because the chance of them ever getting in is so low.

I may think this government is terrible, but I'd much prefer it to a joint Labour Lib-Dem government.

Answer 9

A Coalition government related to the Lib Dems could be marvelous for people who help Lib Dem recommendations, and undesirable for people who oppose them, merely like a conservative government could be good for those following conservative recommendations and a Labour government could be good for those followng Labour recommendations. i do no longer probably think of they could be a moderating effect on the events because of the fact the two Conservative and Labour have centralised in words of their ideologies because of the fact the Nineteen 1890s. Labour have become a techniques much less socialist, adopting some Conservative regulations inclusive of Privatisation (previous Labour have been strongly dedicated to nationalisation of marketplace), and the Conservatives have released a clean kind of conservatism adopting some Labour regulations inclusive of a welfare equipment (which thatcher strongly damaging, yet merely in no way had the boldness to abolish). at present the events are particularly middle floor, and it is not likely the Lib Dems could rather centralise them any added. Additonal: Mikey C is wrong approximately balloting platforms. The Lib Dems have proposed a clean balloting equipment regardless of the undeniable fact that it is the only Transferrable balloting equipment. it fairly is a form of PR regardless of the undeniable fact that it is not organic PR as you seem to think of. additionally, AV isn't a proportional equipment in any respect, it fairly is a majority equipment. in fact, AV is probable much less proportional than First previous the positioned up. Had AV been utilized in 2005, Labour could have won 22 greater setas (they have been alreayd over-represented because it replaced into)

Answer 10

Well hey a hung parliment in the UK would mean that every party could impose more taxes all at once that would keep the lazy rotten polititians happy as they give themselves yet another pay rise as the work so so hard