English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Clinton awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Yugoslavia-good
Bush awards Halliburton no-bid contract in Iraq-bad
Clinton spends 77 billion on war in Serbia-good
Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq–bad
Clinton imposes regime change in Serbia-good
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq-bad
Clinton bombs Christian Serbs on behalf of Muslim Albanian terrorists-good
Bush liberates 25 mil from a genocidal dictator-bad
Clinton bombs Chinese embassy-good
Bush bombs terrorist camps-bad
No mass graves found in Serbia-good
No WMD found Iraq-bad
Clinton refuses to take custody of Bin Laden-good
World Trade Centers fall under Bush-bad
Clinton says Saddam has nukes-good
Bush says Saddam has nukes-bad
Clinton calls for regime change in Iraq-good
Bush imposes regime change in Iraq-bad
Terrorist training in Afghanistan under Clinton-good
Bush destroys training camps in Afghanistan-bad
Milosevic not convicted-good
Saddam tried & convicted-bad

2007-04-07 16:15:08 · 28 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government Politics

The jist of what I'm getting here from the ever tolerant left is that I'm stupid. The gripe is that I mistake on my numbers. For that I'm sorry. I knew that was older info and researched, but forgot to insert it.

Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me USA Proud and Sean. And Walter, I'm sorry but I haven't a clue as to what you're going on about. What is WMP? My only guess is that you've formed your opinions off Michael Moore's fiction.

2007-04-08 10:20:24 · update #1

Kelly B, as always, I respect your comments, but the point is not the men mentioned, but the opinion of the people. The flip-flopping.

Sniper, you make me believe there is hope yet.

2007-04-08 10:24:20 · update #2

28 answers

Your point - good
Liberal reaction - bad

2007-04-07 16:18:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 11 11

this is a strong shaggy dog tale approximately repubbies. Are you waiting? properly, George Bush, Larry Craig, Dennis Hastert pass strolling right into a gay bar................. :) fairly humorous.........till you're a repubbie. enable's communicate approximately some humorous repubbie one liners from the final twelve months....... i'm no longer gay!(Larry Craig) we've faith you...... i did no longer have sexual kin with(what proportion interns became it?) they only gave me mouth hugs.......(Dennis Hastert) we've faith you too........... i'm clever(George Bush) i'm sorry, we can't have faith this one. Hillary in a dominatrix outfit isn't humorous, it would be frightening. i'm scared already, and so would something of the international, and that they'd consistent with probability behave or get spanked. instead of Bushie stealing all the factors of each and every united states that his Daddy did no longer like. Why does it look that one and all whiny far, far, far precise conservatives have not any humorousness? via fact they do no longer. Awwwww, at some point the international would be a extra robust place, the place there will be not extra repubbies, and easily smart and people with basic experience will stay in peace invariably.

2016-12-15 19:07:43 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

There is this area below when you post called, Know your source? List it here:. Maybe you should think about adding in your source instead of just rambling on and on.

1. We need to leave Iraq asap....
2. No WMP
3. We= Good, Them =Bad
4. What part of lie, dont you understand? If he did not, we need to find the person who did and kill them for what they did.
5. Video of G-Bush making fun of NO wmd.
6. Spending like no tomorrow.
7. Cons can IF and IF and IF all you want.
8. How many times must we take up the sword and charge head long into that land to slay the evil that is in it for the sake of God.
9. Know your source?
10. What part of LIE dont you understand people? I just dont understand why you would let somebody LIE to you and send are troops over seas to die. What part of LIE dont you understand. Oh they have WMD, no they did not have WMD and your KING has said so. Why on earth do you quote Clinton for saying they have weopons. Maybe they are sleeping with each other?

Btw, I am not a lefty or a righty. I would die before I gave my soul to one of the parties. You care not for the people around you but for youself per your credo. Do unto other first before they do unto you. I was hoping that people did not live like that but this is the real world and people step over others to get ahead. Keep step n on the backs of are soldiers Cons. Gain your wealth and your marble floors that you so cherish. I just wish to be Rich and that is it. Idea of being rich is to be old and grey watching your grandchildren grow up. Now I am going to have kick tooth and nail to see that they have a future because of what King Bush has done to the bank account.

11. If you want, I will bash the left.
12 Please keep your grammer ceneabs to ylkfskrf

2007-04-07 16:57:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because Americans have been bamboozled into thinking that there are only 2 possible answers to anything, including political parties. I believe we should choose presidents the way we make people meet on sites like eHarmony.com. We should answer long, expository questionnaires about our beliefs and convictions, and the candidate (no matter who) that most closely matches the majority of Americans on these questions would be president until voted out in three-year cycles. The candidates should provide sealed questionnaires answered to be opened after the count of American votes has been completed. Then we would have a three-week national holiday to celebrate and transition the government if necessary.

2007-04-07 16:24:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

Those numbers are way off. The Serbian war was less than $30 billion. The Iraq war has totaled over $400 billion.
I don't recall the chinese embassy bombing being good. Mass graves were found in Serbia. No WMD's have been found in Iraq. Consider reading your news from more disparate viewpoints rather than the same source.

2007-04-07 16:23:22 · answer #5 · answered by i♥sf 5 · 7 3

I'm not going through the whole list, but a few things that quickly spring to mind.

Bush violated international law, as well as going against the UN, a plurality of American citizens, and the opinion of the entire world.

Clinton was helping people by bringing peace, and worked with UN and world agreement.

Bush brought war, destroyed the country, and murdered over 600,000 Iraqis.

Clinton looked for Bin Laden; Bush has refused to do so, after a much worse attack. Bush was warned of the destruction of the towers and did nothing.

"Calls for" doesn't murder people; dropping cluster bombs on civilians does.

You forget Clinton did not engage in torture; Bush does.

You also forget Clinton had budget surpluses; Bush has put us deeper in debt than all previous gross spenders put together.

I will just add that the indifference to murder and suffering consistently shown by supporters of Bush (not to mention Bush itself) never ceases to amaze me.

You really think that slaughtering 3 month old babies is a wonderful thing.

You think that your tax money spent on committing rape is just grand.

You think the destruction of your own country is super-spiffy.

I just don't get it.

2007-04-07 16:34:54 · answer #6 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 3 3

Just to add a little to what you already said...Clinton employed Halliburton more times than Bush has. No Kidding.

2007-04-08 06:46:44 · answer #7 · answered by sean1201 6 · 1 0

Why do you come on Answers and lie?
Your selection of statements are misleading at best and just plain wrong the rest of the time.
for instance - Bush spends 87 billion in Iraq–bad

""The cost of the war in Iraq will reach $320 billion after the expected passage next month of an emergency spending bill currently before the Senate, and that total is likely to more than double before the war ends, the Congressional Research Service estimated this week.""

2007-04-07 16:28:14 · answer #8 · answered by oohhbother 7 · 2 4

I'm a registered democrat and I agree with you all the way. I'm glad you had the info to put on here. I'm not surprised at peoples behavior. What saddens me is how people can claim that the Clinton's were so good for the country but yet they left a dark shadow over Washington when they left before. Not to mention the embarrassment.

2007-04-07 16:24:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

Clinton did not give Haliburton a no bid contract to run the whole war:(
We lost NO troops in Serbia GOOD
Regime change in Iraq should not have happened because we had no right to go in there
Bush liberated 25 million and is now trying to kill each one.
You seem to feel it was good that the WTC went down under Bush
You have no thought process - BAD

2007-04-07 16:25:18 · answer #10 · answered by Nort 6 · 6 5

Bill Clinton was so last decade. Get over it!

He had to face a Republican controlled Congress.
They had the chance to oversight. But that was the past.

Trying to be witty doesn't excuse the sins of today.

2007-04-07 16:51:14 · answer #11 · answered by Johnny 5 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers