yes. and she still doesnt get it! the libs dont get it. she went over there and made a fool of herself and everyone is laughing at her, well, except the other democrats. there is one word for nancy pelosi..TOOL. the terrorists and assassins used her to make a mockery of the united states. she cared not one bit about foreign policy regarding these criminal. she is not above the law. she should be horse whipped then tried for treason and made to hand in her scarf, the foolish old woman.
2007-04-07 13:44:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by afterflakes 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
No one, not even the Speaker of the House should establish their own Foreign Policy and visit ANY country where that visit is not sanctioned by the White House especially one that Bush has already deemed a State sponsor of terrorist networks.
After meeting with the Syrian dictator, Ms. Pelosi announced that she had delivered a message from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that “Israel was ready to engage in peace talks” with Syria. Unfortunately, this was not the case and by those words she misrepresented Israel’s position.
I see it as just more callus attempts by the far left to undermine Bush along with his Secretary of State Dr. Condoleezza Rice, whose job it is to visit foreign countries under the direction of the White House.
As far as I am concerned, the power of her position has gone to her head and Madam Speaker is now Madam loose cannon.
2007-04-07 13:46:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by GeneL 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
No, she should be thrown out for guiding lucrative Military Construction contracts to her husbands companies while she chaired the Military Construction appropriations comittee. Very unethical and illegal.
Ok, for the treason thing too.
2007-04-07 13:45:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I examine a piece of writing in a mag. bragging approximately how no longer common n.p. is. It mentioned each between the democrats had to vote the way she mentioned in the different case...i think the democratic vote interior the home is a vote for n.p. as a replace of the states they symbolize. So confident, i'm going to vote republican.
2016-10-21 07:43:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
With respect to our representative, it was a fairly seditious thing to do. I'm grateful you didn't call her names or otherwise spread unfounded rumors. With sedition, the worst thing we can do is imitate it in response.
2007-04-07 13:41:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
well there should at least be a special prosecutor to investigate if she was selling foreign policy for the U.S. and Israel without express, written consent from the duly elected leaders of said countries.
2007-04-07 13:48:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by mike_dooley49 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
nope; its called discussing things; neocons know how to do it they figured it out when N Korea got nukes. Suddenly N korea drops off the axis of evil and an insane dictatorship into a group capable of disarmament.
2007-04-07 13:41:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Well I dont know how I feel about that. Originially I felt like they should let it slide, but I changed my mind because it seems like she just did it to embarrass and disrespect the president. Not cool.
2007-04-07 13:55:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Theodore Sebastian 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
yes and bush is the president of Mexico
2007-04-10 22:35:32
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO!
She is the best thing for the Republican Party in several years.
2007-04-07 13:49:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Lives7 6
·
2⤊
1⤋