I don't know why they can't admit it. They seem so very devoted to the idea of defeat.
(Man that is one ugly cat up there!)
2007-04-07 13:29:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Three points of contention:
1) Electronic voting problems - there were, literally, impossible voting tallies in some counties.
2) Disenfranchisement of legitimate voters via purging of voter rolls - many legitimate voters were denied the ability to vote, or, in the case of Ohio, by not allocating working voting machines to democratic districts, so voters had to wait in lines for over 8 hours, in the rain to vote. Blatant voter suppression.
3) Exit polls - This is one of the most accurate measures ever, refined over the years. This is the basis upon which elections in nations such as Ukraine were legitimately challenged. Using the same techniques, ours were suddenly "flawed." However, no one has ever said HOW they were flawed. They only came to that conclusion by starting at the end result - that the elections MUST have been on the up and up, and worked backward to ASSUME the methodology was flawed, or that massive amounts of people, for the first time ever or since, lied to exit pollers just for the sake of lying to them.
There was no evidence of widespread or swing-area fraud on those other fake examples you laid out.
The facts line up with a fixed election, and many of the counter-arguments about the security and integrity of the equipment and the organizations involved have since been thoroughly disproven.
The Dems can admit it, but shouldn't unless it is warranted. When the Republicans organize an out of state mob to stage a riot in Broward County to stop a legitimate manual recount, then our elections have all the credibility of a third world dictatorship-run farce, not that of the supposed leaders in democratic ideals.
2007-04-07 18:01:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Better than the Liar by the name of George W Bush who with the help of brother Jeb stole the election in Florida in 2000. To bad couldn't go back in time and have a recount done properly then the Sociopath by the name of George Walker Bush would have been stopped from creating 6 years of insanity with his go it alone attitude.
2007-04-07 17:59:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Truthfully? You teach college? Good for you. English is the hardest of all the classes to grade because it is so subjective. I have taught high school and middle school English and social studies. We won't agree on political issues, but at least we are in the same field. George W. has twin daughters, how did you sneak in? Was it that lost weekend he spent with Rosie O'Donnell?
2007-04-07 17:58:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No matter what I think of you (not good) or Dumbya (can't be worse), I have to congratulate to you on nailing point #2, under "Look who you run" - the candidates were, indeed, wishy-washy at best. But still, a monkey for the president? Oh well. 652 more days.
P.S.
The crime mob called "the Bush family" is very skilled in hiding evidence for the criminal Dumbya, both re. his desertion and the fraud Celeste talks about. It was fraud, but no proof - that's why, sadly, Dumbya and Fat Cokehead Jeb are not in jail.
2007-04-07 17:53:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
I think it is because they are too busy partying over the fact that they won the House of Representatives and the Senate.
2007-04-07 18:00:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by Amphibolite 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
i dont think there will ever be an uncontested election for the democrats if a republican wins. they are always busy proving voter fraud BEFORE elections complete with purchased witnesses and attorneys to come forth the moment results are announced. funny, they were all set to contest this latest election blabbing that they had everyone ready to get to work proving fraud, but they won..............not a bleeding peep from anyone. they think they didnt win because of fraud because they do not comprehend that people do not think like them and vote for them. they believe their power should be handed down to them, not competed for, not for the people to decide. they dont think americans are smart enough to choose a leader. they prove it all the time when they try to tell us we how to raise our kids, what cars we should drive, what to eat, that we cant smoke.............soon, what doctors to go to, when we can go, where to live......ware the nanny state. it is coming...brought to you by your nearest liberal....
2007-04-07 19:59:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by afterflakes 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
The point is we won congress in november in a landslide. You guys are headed up the creek and have no boat.
2007-04-07 17:51:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Fraud is not a win
2007-04-07 17:50:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by hellary 2
·
3⤊
3⤋
I don't like Libs, nosire.
2007-04-07 17:55:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋