From my view when A Liberal fights against terrorist its with words and the terrorist are of the hook again and being praised but when Bush fights the terrorist he called hitler saten warmonger every name in the book and the libs are trying to tell the terrorist that your off the hook again it gets all my nerves.
2007-04-07
10:25:44
·
18 answers
·
asked by
Jeremy P
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
oh one more thing terrorist don't care for words.
2007-04-07
10:32:17 ·
update #1
its all those anti american leaders that call him that.
2007-04-07
12:11:37 ·
update #2
Well we see what happens when President Bush fights the terrorists; We kill them by the dozens and they don't attack our country for what is it, 5 years now?
I'd say good things happen.
We don't know what happens when A liberal fights terrorists cause we've never seen it happen. Clinton sat back time after time and just let them kill us and attack us without doing anything. Carter was worse than Clinton. Pelosi is going th Hanoi Jane route and eating dinner with them. Hell I'm waiting to see Kerry walking through and Al Qaida training camp praising them for the "freedom fighters" they are.
Fact is, liberals won't fight terrorism. Ever. So we could never answer your question except in hypothetical anwsers.
HEY MOUNTAIN.... YOU SPELLED SATAN WRONG YOURSELF... IT WOULD BE HORRIBLE IF IT MADE HIM LOOK FOOLISH, WHAT'S THAT MAKE YOU?
A LIBERAL.
2007-04-07 10:39:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I didn't know Bush deferred to terrorists. At least, he is always claiming to be fighting them. And what is a "hitler saten warmonger" anyway. I know who Hitler was and I know what a warmonger is but I am unclear on the saten part. Perhaps you meant satin and just don't know how to spell it? My advice is to use the "Check Spelling" function before posting a question. It reduces the chance of making yourself look stupid.
2007-04-07 11:47:43
·
answer #2
·
answered by Amphibolite 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
When bush fights terrorism, he actually meets savage aggresion with aggresion. The liberals think that the best way to fight terrorism is to discuss how we deserved it and still be shocked when it happens again and again and again. Maybe the next time one of our building gets blown up by a suicide bomber, more people will come to the conclusion that by the mere fact the US is the most powerful and richest nation on earth - we will have inherent enemies that want to do us harm. I wonder if they think that 9/11 was the only time islamo-fasicts were planning on doing something like that. I wonder if they think it a coincidence that it hasn't happened again?
2007-04-07 10:41:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by CrazyChris 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
Actually, when a lieberal goes to war against terror, they either bend over for the terrorists or they run like hell with their arms in the air screaming bloody murder.
2007-04-07 11:38:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kevin A 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
You know, I'm not all that surprise by your classic show of ignorance when comparing liberals to terrorists.
You seem to think that because liberals aren't on board with Bush that automatically lumps them in the same league as the terrorists.
2007-04-07 10:30:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
The difference is that Bush really fights the terrorists.
The liberals fight the USA, and support the terrorists every day.
2007-04-07 10:30:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by wolf 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
That's a first for me. A lib fighting a terrorist. Who, where, and when??
2007-04-07 10:30:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by 1st Buzie 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
What's the "deference"? Is that a reference to all the Bush-ites who avoided military service?
2007-04-07 10:32:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Bush blows up anyone, from babies to grandpas. Liberals consider all options before going in for the kill. Learn from that example.
2007-04-07 10:31:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by ToYou,Too! 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
I see how the idea for not funding education in the south worked out for the republicans remaining in office.
2007-04-07 10:39:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by LuckyD 3
·
0⤊
2⤋