What tells mass to curve Space - Time?

Question

Slightly technical and pedantic question.
But, i was wondering, if things like Guage Bosons tell particles "what to do" (if you like) when they are exchanged and the hypothetical Higgs boson is supposed to be what gives matter a mass, then i was just wondering what could tell Space-time to curve around mass?

Answer 1

E=Mc^2 Mass is energy. It vibrates in the space-time membrane causing a slight curve proportional to its mass.

Answer 2

Messenger particles like the bosons can not only tell mass what to do, they can tell mass to act like mass (i.e., have inertia) in the case of the Higgs bosons making up the Higgs field. Some theories, like string/M theory posit a messenger graviton, but none has been observed to date.

I personally find the cause-effect of mass and curved space at bit confounding. Is it mass that curves space through a gravitational attraction caused by mass; or is it curved space cause by the presence of mass that causes the gravitational attraction.

If mass curves space through some messenger, like the graviton, then what is the source of the energy that creates those gravitons? Why is that source seemingly unlimited?

If gravity is the effect of curved space rather than some messenger particle from mass, then what does the mass emit to cause space to curve in the first place? Might there be a messenger particle we can call the warpiton that bends space and causes things to follow the bends in space...like light and meteors?

Answer 3

According to particle physics, there should be a force mediator for gravity called a graviton, but this particle has not been detected yet. Furthermore, these two ideas of gravity (it being mediated by a particle, and it being the result of curved space time) are competing ideas, and are not considered complementary.

To the person below: Yes, both theories could be valid, but that doesn't mean they can be mixed. As in your example, we think of light as having both particle-like and wave-like properties, but generally when we study it, we have to think of it as either wave-like or particle-like depending on what we're doing with it.

Similarly, when we think of quantum mechanics, we think of gravity as being mediated by gravitons, and when we think of relativity, we think of curved spacetime, but we do not think of curved spacetime as being a result of gravitons.

Answer 4

in accordance to particle physics, there must be a stress mediator for gravity observed as a graviton, yet this particle has now no longer been detected yet. to boot to, those 2 recommendations of gravity (it being mediated via a particle, and it being the end results of curved section time) are competing recommendations, and are not considered complementary. To the guy less than: certain, both theories must be valid, yet that does no longer recommend they are able to be blended. As on your social gathering, we imagine of sunshine as having both particle-like and wave-like properties, yet in a lot of situations as straight away as we study it, shall we continuously imagine of of it as both wave-like or particle-like relying on what we are doing with it. to boot, as straight away as we imagine of quantum mechanics, we imagine of gravity as being mediated via gravitons, and as straight away as we imagine of relativity, we imagine of curved spacetime, yet we do not imagine of of curved spacetime as being a outcome of gravitons.

Answer 5

Gravitons, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton
Both curved-space and quantum mechanical descriptions can be valid, as it is to consider a light beam as a continuous wave or photons.