Why do neo-nazis believe in the liberal media myth like conservatives?

Question

They all understand, of course, that their Jewish bosses expect a certain slant on the reporting they do. They understand which side their bread is buttered on. They don't want to bite the hand that feeds them. But their liberal bias goes beyond just trying to please the Jewish media bosses who employ them.
http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs974d.html

"Now, one of the reasons why these media people weren't embarrassed is that many of them belong to a race which is biologically incapable of feeling shame. And the ones who don't belong to that race have trained themselves to think and behave just like their Jewish bosses. That's one of the reasons for the shameless behavior of the controlled media."

"This is why the media folks become hysterical whenever new signs of popular opposition to the government become visible, whether in the form of a terrorist bombing or a group merely wanting to be left alone, like the Branch Davidians or the Montana Freemen. It's why we have a major assault underway on the First and Second Amendments by left-wing academics, who want to limit what we can say and also take away our means to protect our right to say it. It's why any questioning of even the most far-fetched "Holocaust" claims or any comment about the Jewish control of the mass media or any scientific inquiry into racial differences or any public statement which might offend feminists or homosexuals or non-Whites brings such an intolerant, closed-minded, and spiteful response from the liberal/Jewish/media/government sector.
http://www.natvan.com/free-speech/fs969b.html

PAGAN,

Read the damn quote. They say the phrase "LIBERAL MEDIA".

What else do you want???

They consider the word jew and liberal to be one and the same. After all, most jews are liberal.

BRAD,

Neo-nazis agree with you. How does that feel?

justgood,

I have the same quote saved on my computer ready to be used against cons at a moment's notice. My websource was not as well known or reliable as yours. Thanks for the info. I'll use the fordham.edu link from now on.

Answer 1

Fascism and American conservatism as I've come to know it share an irrational hate and paranoia for all liberal vallues.
Straight from Mussolini himself
...iven that the nineteenth century was the century of Socialism, of Liberalism, and of Democracy, it does not necessarily follow that the twentieth century must also be a century of Socialism, Liberalism and Democracy: political doctrines pass, but humanity remains, and it may rather be expected that this will be a century of authority...a century of Fascism.
The foundation of Fascism is the conception of the State, its character, its duty, and its aim. Fascism conceives of the State as an absolute, in comparison with which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. The conception of the Liberal State is not that of a directing force, guiding the play and development, both material and spiritual, of a collective body, but merely a force limited to the function of recording results: on the other hand, the Fascist State is itself conscious and has itself a will and a personality -- thus it may be called the "ethic" State....
And to kinda follow up on your previous Q
Fascism [is] the complete opposite of…Marxian Socialism, the materialist conception of history of human civilization can be explained simply through the conflict of interests among the various social groups and by the change and development in the means and instruments of production.... Fascism, now and always, believes in holiness and in heroism; that is to say, in actions influenced by no economic motive, direct or indirect. And if the economic conception of history be denied, according to which theory men are no more than puppets, carried to and fro by the waves of chance, while the real directing forces are quite out of their control, it follows that the existence of an unchangeable and unchanging class-war is also denied - the natural progeny of the economic conception of history. And above all Fascism denies that class-war can be the preponderant force in the transformation of society....

Answer 2

They use the time period 'liberal Jew media' which stems from the 40s and became Howard Campbell Jr. stuff to unite the 'whites' adversarial to the Jews. This unwell and antiquated propaganda has no relation to the Liberal media that conservatives see now. The media now might want to be no longer extremely liberal, in preserving with se, notwithstanding that's earnings pushed. Its purpose is now no longer to 'report' on activities yet to 'impression' public coverage, the finest purpose being earnings.

Answer 3

You should go into the ministry. Long questions and your research show your mind is made up. You do not want an answer you want a soap box. You would make a good politician or a law-er. Good luck to you every one has a slant. Yours seems to be a neo-nazi. Keep your beliefs and do good thing for humanity.

Answer 4

er... Jews/zionist are liberals to them? right? all minorities are liberals to them, from what I have heard...

yeah... interesting question... never thought about it like that...

I would guess it's because they both can't fight the facts, so they are reduced to slandering the news sources that don't pander to them?

you wouldn't think conservatives would want to take a page out of their playbook though... would you?

Answer 5

Neo-nazis don't believe the media has a liberal bias; rather, they believe it has a Zionist bias.

Answer 6

It's not a myth...the only news outlet without a liberal bias is FOX.
ps---it feels meaningless

Answer 7

Don't speak for them.