sRI LANKA IS BETTER FROM INDIA IN THE CRICKET? AGREE OR NO?

Question

I AM DILSHAN, SRI LANKA CRICKET TEAM MEMBER
WE MUST WIN THE REMAINDER OF MATCHES
WITH YOUR BLESSINGS WE CAN SHINE IN THE CUP!!!!!!

Answer 1

Yes, Sri Lanka is better. =)

Answer 2

in simple terms because india gained the twenty20 global cup doesnt mean they are the finest team contained in the global. That replaced into the first time someting like that replaced into performed and communities werent used to it. If anybody is going via that zimbabwe are more advantageous positive than the auzzies because they beat them in twenty20. Sri Lanka would have gained one try journey, that doesnt mean something. If we went on what you imagine everytime a team looses it means they are crap and who ever wins must be made global volume one. Whats incorrect with making use of a squash ball???? You sound like someone who's acquainted with no longer something about cricket via declaring the umpires value sri lanka a try journey. in the journey that they are so solid then why does each and everything journey on how properly sangakkara performs ?

Answer 3

I am definitely sour you are not TILAKRATNA DILSHAN because player like him will not add such controversial or cheap answer.
I have answer to your question take not it.
Why you not asked this question when India was undefinable to you for 2 years, badly defeated in home series by the hand of Indian in ODI (6-1) and in Tests (2-0).
Not go long, what happen to your team before the world cup.
One good day doesnot mean that you are better then India team. Talent in INDIA is so spread that you can make 3 international team with equally capable.
None of your player selected in the INDIA team except Jayasuria and Sangakara.
On a flat or seaming pitches INDIA are better to you. If you not believe please check their record match played between these team on such type of wickets.
Yes you are better then Indian team on slow pitches because of your controversial player. I hope you understand whom I talking for.
Make sure you will net tagged as minnow again when Murlidhran retire.

Answer 4

yeah...i agree that Sri Lanka is much better than India and I will love them see win the world cup, but who the hell are you???
i don think you're Dilshan...
just put a picture and trying to bluff others...

dilshan is a professional cricket and obviously he will know writing etiquette in internet...
he won't be using ALL CAPITAL letters...

if you were dilshan..there would have been a official seal from Yahoo...

you don know how to bluff....

Answer 5

I am Indian and I will definately say that Sri Lanka is better team than India these days.

Answer 6

Actually..Cricket team of Sri Lanaka much beter than Indiari Lankans.They are capable of being the champions this time.
They are in a good shape.They have flair & talent.
Honestly ..man..SL has good balance with Ur bowling & fielding.Ofcourse as well as batting.
I once heard 'Rameez" said in a match, "in 1996 Lankans had Mahanama . he was a fantastic fielder.Dilshan now fills that position."
Um.. so.. i think you had beter take these in to mind
....and... challenge -even-to the superman> ability of
"Best fielder everJonty Rhodes" himself.
Now most immportantly Lankans have rekindled their ability
to win matches in alien ,overseas conditions,..not only at home conditions.
They proved that in Guyana's newest stadium..
You guys defeated star studded Indian team with clinical aproach.
South Africans escaaped unscathed by desimal points.
Actually why Mahela didn't put slip fielder to Malinga's
last over..? Nobody knows..why...he could have stationed him self.
Lankans would have won with Africans if mahela put a slip catcher.

As Mahela puts..........."It's time to be ruthless".
They proved that toppling host Windies by magnificiant approach. Now Sanath & Mahela among runs,they are unstoppable!


So now i gonna prove Sl bter than India As U suggest.......
Can you remember,..? Ummm...It was supposed to ...be Indian's, world cup this time.
They were the commercial favourites.
Sachin being senior most he should have waited until right moment comes.
But these blokes from Sri Lanka had other ideas.
Furthermore it was 250 runs to get....
Lankans got it by running between wickets.
They have come of age now.Asian are the best now.
These Bangladeshis proved Asians are the best Cricketers.

Australian Dominance may Decline in near future in front of these fighting Asians....Nobody knows..
But We have solid facts for that....
SL has upper hand...for future games..
In Super 8 They have 'lil 'threat by Az..
But that match might be a heart stopper.
Its all the way for Asian Teams who are becoming true giants.
No more 'Old-English-gentelmen' ruling the Cricket World.
But see how they became top of the world right now...
Though they beat india They still had to give their best ever performance..
They almost won with South Africa.,by Malinga heroics.
Now It's Sri Lanka's time to be Called As,...
"Star- studded Cricket team of World cup -2007"
Their.. ballers and fielders taught how to win when you ,balling second time.
When Uthappa and Ganguly walked in, India had a target of just 255 runs, on a wicket which had dried and gone flatter. But nobody showed the charactor to stay on, except Dravid. It was his flurry of fours off Malinga in one over that had raised the hopes of Indian fans just for a while.
Anybody can be so sure that ,the turning point was Sachin’s getting out to Big-Fernando, through the gate for duck.
Then prossesion has started.Gibbs, Sachin Ganguli,Lara,Smith, Chanderpaul....& many more to come.
Like wise when Vass on full flaw any thing can happen.
History may repeat this time like 1996.
They made presure on much favoured Indians.
Next,England ,Australia & NewZealand have to feel presure.

It is really worth analysing the difference among -"would be semi finlists"( the 4teams)
S.African’s ,Kiwis & windies' strength was batting and given the proper conditions, their medium pacers and the spinners could be devastating.
If not, Their shoulders start drooping and the bowling goes haywire with all kind of experimentations.
It could happen to their batting too.

Exactly opposite are Sri Lanka, except that their batting is as good if not better. We were the big brothers when they started. Now they are the elders. What an irony. They are better fielders for sure, and the bowlers bowl to the field under any circumstances unless it’s a completely off day for them.

Muralitharan,Vass,Malinga is just outstanding. And most importantly, they play as a team and not as individuals. And that’s the thin line that differentiated the two teams. We saw absolutely no regional biases, despite all kinds of problems in their small country.They had civil war,& Tsunami.
But still they rise like legendery phinix bird.
So wait,fans more fire works yet to come...
They now have to beat only 3 teams to advance easyly to much awaited semi finals.
you always have our Blessings.
Long live cricket !!!!!!!

Answer 7

To win the matches, players will have to play better cricket consistently. Only with blessings no team can win a
tournament.

Answer 8

HI dilshan...hw r u..haha..
yup definitely srilanka is muchmuchmuchn better thaan india..
im indian nd sri lanka rocks....

Answer 9

yes sri lanka is definitely better.
by the way great fielding and batting low down in the order..keep it up!!

Answer 10

yes sri lanka playing great cricket,, india histroy