English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3 answers

According to Le Chatelier's principle, changing the concentration of an ingredient will shift the equilibrium to the side that would reduce that change in concentration, so the reaction would have to be a reversible reaction, or one where the dynamic equilibrium favors either the product or the reactant.

2007-04-07 07:54:50 · answer #1 · answered by meggush 3 · 0 0

Well of course we think of reversible reactions in chemistry.

But in fact, this principle would apply to any state of dynamic equilibrium. Think of people in a building. It is in dynamic equilibrium if the same number leave as are entering. But cause a change in the building status (add an atraction) and the population of the building will increase!

2007-04-07 07:51:39 · answer #2 · answered by reb1240 7 · 0 0

i'm no longer too particular on what would take place if carbon became extra, even regardless of the shown fact that i'm rather constructive that reducing the stress would shift the reaction to product area. that's via fact the product is two moles of CO, which ought to occupy extra quantity than one mole of CO2 (to seize up on decreased stress). Le Châtelier's thought states that the equilibrium will shift to counteract stresses, so it would shift to the realm with extra moles (the quantity occupied with the help of effective carbon is negligible).

2016-12-15 18:44:57 · answer #3 · answered by claypoole 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers