Bush is a scholar and has a great mind. If he is a fool- more genius he is to be a fool and president both. Bush has a speech impediment -Is that a fair target?? What if he had a limp instead? Don't like his face- and call him chimp? What other looks do you discriminate over: color, burn victims? What does stuttering and stumbling over your own tongue have to do with anything?
2007-04-07 07:02:01 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Laxer- you just misspelled incompetent - that's a mistake-- are you dumb? I would say no.
2007-04-07 07:10:46 · update #1
They are equal oportunity haters. They hate anyone who challenges thewir worldview without regard to race, creed or handicap.
2007-04-07 07:05:45 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 16⤊ 4⤋
Huh? You've got it all wrong. We do not hate the disabled. Your idea about Bush being a great scholar is purely a matter of opinion. Being a fool doesn't make you become a genius. No, he doesn't have a speech impediment -- bumbling parts of your speech isn't an "impediment." In politics it is a fair target. I don't remember us attacking Bob Dole's disabled arm, why would we attack the hypothetical limp? (see Cleland, Max) Yes, I don't like his face. No, I don't call him chimp. No we don't discriminate against people of color. I think people in general tend to react differently to burn victims. If you're going into politics, practice your delivery.
2007-04-07 14:47:58 · answer #2 · answered by hgherron2 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
What exactly is "Tolerence?" A village in Texas? Bush has no speeech impediment - learn what those are. He is illiterate and very stupid, judging by his history of political and business decisions (basically, not a single good one, ever). He is unbearably ugly, true. Stuttering, etc., showss his inability to think in a coherent, focused, organized and productive way. It's borderline dementia, at best, probably from his drug and alcohol abuse. Finally, about the disabled - it is republicans who ran the military hospital where wounded vets were treated like trash, and the ultimate responsibility for that liees with the joke of a human who is the Commander-in-Chief. Who hates the disabled, again?
2007-04-07 18:20:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
The meaning of the word "tolerance" is the same as "suffer" and "endure" ( the Latin term is tolerare )
So no , I'm not tolerant ;-)
Either I accept something or somebody, or not , but I do never agree to suffer or endure that somebody is suffering because of a dude like your President.
2007-04-08 03:57:32 · answer #4 · answered by willow, the yodakitty from hell 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ohhhhh.......now it's a "speech impediment?"
I don't call your dad a chimp. Teflon, maybe, but not a chimp.
I think the best response came from comedian Josh Blue - who has cerebral palsy - on Carlo's Mencia's show:
"I might have CP...but at least I'm not dee-dee-dee!"
2007-04-07 14:44:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
First of all, as I have stated before, the term "liberal" is based on economic policy.
As for Bush's speech impediment- it is self-imposed. He chooses to say nucular, rather than nuclear. He chooses to say things like "fool me the first time shame on you... if you fool... uhh... you can..... uhh... the point is I won't let you fool me again!"... That has nothing to do with "liberals". His own father has made fun of him!
2007-04-07 14:14:43 · answer #6 · answered by mangani_187 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Let them make fun of him all they want, it's not going to change anything. I'm sure Bush doesn't really care, He obviously has done more with his life than these people will do with their own, they are just jealous of his Authority so they resort to name calling and threats.
2007-04-07 14:35:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Tolerance is one thing. We applaud people with disabilities that make something out of their life anyway, through determination and hard work. Not having our way paid for us, no active military, like Bush. As far as the speech impediment, there are therapists for that but, I imagine King Bush thinks he is too good for that. And last but not least, his actions have spoken loud and clear, he does not have to say anything at all to be target.
Genius??? Cheney and Rove's limp duck puppet is more like it.
None of it is 'fair', anytime you point a finger at someone, look at your hand, you are actually pointing at yourself with the 4 other fingers.
2007-04-07 14:12:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Liberals believe that they hold the high moral ground & are completely non-judgemental...rather contradictory in light of the fact that they display zero tolerance for anything that smacks of Conservative & Traditional values!!
2007-04-07 14:16:23 · answer #9 · answered by foxfire 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
how come you only criticize the spelling of those who disagree, now, is that fair and balanced? You're right, there's is no need to focus on these superficial things when one must only address his record. He didn't bring freedom to Iraq, only a different sort of terror. He didn't cut taxes, he only deferred them to the next generation as huge budget deficits, the people he appointed have been disgraced as corrupt and dishonest. He is a convicted CRIMINAL!
2007-04-07 14:23:46 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
He doesn't have a speech impediment. Mispronouncing things out of ignorance and refusing to correct yourself at some point is not an impediment that can't be changed like stuttering or a lisp.
2007-04-07 14:07:12 · answer #11 · answered by I'll Take That One! 4 · 5⤊ 6⤋