2007-04-07 06:45:41 · 13 answers · asked by GO HILLARY 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What is wrong with wanting peace? Do you like the blood spill so much that you won't give it a chance? Bush listens to nobody....not advisors that tell him this war was a stupid action....not people that tell him it will not work. He is as inflexible as a rock and almost as smart. Sounds like you are a close second.
2007-04-07 06:54:24 · answer #1 · answered by kolacat17 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Peace Pipe Pelosi? Cool handle for her. Maybe she can be given a Nobel Peace prize. Wow! No she should not talk to Cindy: she already agrees with Cindy. Bush or one of his lackys needs to talk to Cindy. What harm would there be in talking to Cindy nicely and then ignoring her like he does everyone else?
2007-04-07 06:52:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, but Pelosi should let Cindy be her running mate.
2007-04-07 06:52:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Why I think you have an excellent idea. Pelosi and Sheehan say they are ONLY filled with peace and love, so it is logical that they should unite in a common effort to destroy our credibility around the world...together!
This way if they are wrapped up in each other - our GREAT President can keep fighting the War on Terror with patriots instead of traitors.
2007-04-07 06:52:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I trust the poster who mentioned that Bush is all hat and no livestock. the main annoying edge of his character to me, however, is his tendency (substantiated by potential of adequate of people who understand him) to make up his recommendations on any given concern very without delay, and then in no way exchange it, whatever data arises that his standpoint is in fact in blunders. some human beings migt evaluate this to be admirable, steadfast, and consistent--I call it hasty and obdurate. it rather is possibly the reason maximum of of his tried movements have long previous awry.
2016-10-21 07:03:05 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she will get more coherent reasoning and willingness to compromise from the Syrians than she would from poor Cindy.
2007-04-07 06:50:12 · answer #6 · answered by I'll Take That One! 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She is guilty of Treasonous Actions, by underming the Administration's Foriegn Policies....
She should take a gas pipe
2007-04-07 06:52:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
She is lucky she did not get hit over the head with a pipe while in Damascus. Our loss her gain.
2007-04-07 07:07:49 · answer #8 · answered by sam simeon 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Pelosi is no Peacenik.
you belittle your position with idiocy
2007-04-07 06:50:28 · answer #9 · answered by jj raider 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Someone has to talk for the smirking chimp.
2007-04-07 06:52:19 · answer #10 · answered by Raven 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋