Why does nature abhor a vacuum?

Question

what has nature got against vacuums anyway, and isn't this blatant vacuumist discrimination? or is there really nothing in it?

Answer 1

Because it sucks...sorry couldn't resist.

But, seriously, physics, which explains the physical nature of nature, points out that a vacuum is a space of low energy. Why? Because there is little there to energize. Heat energy, for example, needs molecules of some sort to vibrate. Thus, the comparable space outside a vacuum space has higher energy densities.

And that's what nature can't abide...those higher energy densities. Mother nature is eqalitarian, she wants everything to share in the same levels of energy all over the universe. So when she has a chance, she will fill a vacuum with something; so that the energy density where that vacuum once was is raised to the energy density outside where the vacuum once was. In that way, the former vacuum space and comparable outside space levels of energy density are the same...or close to it.

Answer 2

relies upon on the way you view a vacuum in line with risk? In deep area, there are merely some molecules/atoms around. In each cubic meter possibly a number of atoms. So even many straightforward years from the closest planet/megastar etc, nevertheless there is matter floating around. The stress gets decrease and decrease (on an inverse logarithmic scale) yet will in no way fairly attain 0. Having labored for a time in an marketplace that makes use of actually low vacuum pressures, i will vouch for the undeniable fact that regardless of the undeniable fact that no longer common you attempt, "nature" will discover a thank you to the two push most of the exterior molecules into the chamber, or face as much as all tries to get the molecules interior the chamber to the exterior! in spite of this, on a sub-atomic point, the rather volume ccupied by potential of the protons/neutrons/electrons etc is amazingly small with regards to the dimensions of the outer electron shell. as a result, you think approximately almost all of the universe is vacuum, broken sporadically by potential of sub-atomic debris. So, on a macro point, then i think there is vacuum that nature will in no way fill, on a familiar point there is not any vacuum that nature won't fill and on the traditional, worry-unfastened experience point, then possibly - it relies upon how a techniques between person atoms you planned to be a vacuum!

Answer 3

Because things move around.

Say someplace had a vacuum. There's always stuff (lots of molecules of various elements and compounds, particularly air) moving randomly around. Some of that stuff will just, by chance, find its way into the area of the vacuum.

Answer 4

Because sound cannot travel in vacuum so I am not surprised nature abhors it!. By the way how did you come to this conclusion?

Answer 5

It had a very traumatic experience involving a vacuum and a pack of sugar at a tender age.

Answer 6

Everybody hates Mr Dyson for moving production from Wales to Chona.

Answer 7

Third law of thermodynamics

Answer 8

Cant stand de noise myself