How come conservatives have such a hard time believing that Global Warming exists?

Question

Step 1: We do things such as driving gas-guzzling vehicles, emitting harmful gases into the environment.

Step 2: These gases open up holes in our ozone layer.

Step 3: With our ozone layer degraded, more of the Sun's rays are able to penetrate our atmosphere.

It's as simple as that.
Most scientists endorse the theory of global warming, noting a rise in annual global temperatures.
How in the world is it even remotely possible that it doesn't exist?!?!?

Answer 1

Because of hypocrites like Al Gore. (And please don't label me a conservative!)

Edit: Top forecaster calls Gore an 'alarmist' on warming
A top hurricane forecaster called Al Gore "a gross alarmist" Friday for making an Oscar-winning documentary about global warming.

"He's one of these guys that preaches the end of the world type of things. I think he's doing a great disservice and he doesn't know what he's talking about," Dr. William Gray said

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070407/ap_on_sc/hurricane_conference

Answer 2

I find it astounding that you simplify the weather in such a manner and that you ignore the THOUSANDS of Scientists who do not agree with The Goricle, the UN, or the premise of Kyoto or the Legal thoughts of the Supreme Court.
I agree with only one premise on your side of the arguement that we be better stewards of the environment. Saying that, The UN is at odds with the Goricle about how much water will rise if the Ice Caps melt. In earlier times the Ice Caps were water. In earlier times there was alot more ice than today. The Models being used by your side in the arguement are wrong anyway because according to an MIT physics professor the weather can't be modeled correctly because supercomputers in use today can't handle the data required so what is left is not accurate. In the Northwest, in the Cascade Range, data on snow cover was CHERRY PICKED to show Global Warming. A true scientist does not Cherry pick data, they try to include ALL of it so that the variables can factor out. You mentioned another factor in your arguement that does not factor in the Global Warming debate. Solar influence. Mars is getting warmer and there is no people there. Guess what Einstein? We are CLOSER the the SUN. We do not have the ability to change the climate in the manner that NATURAL FORCES have the ability to change the Climate. One Volcano can produce enough pollutants to cool the climate as happened in 1816 than we could do in a century. Most scientists do not endorse your claim who work in Meterology and Physics. Go to Junk Science.com and get educated.

Answer 3

First Most scientists DO NOT agree with Global Warming. Most of them agree that Human beings have VERY VERY little (if any) impact on the Earth's climate.

The first major thing to look at is the Earth's orbit around the Sun. We do not have a perfect, stable, orbit so these fluctuations have the biggest impact on the Earth's temp.

Then Volcanic activity is second, one major eruption can force more ash and gasses into the atmosphere than all humankind combined.

Ice Core samples reveal CO2 levels off the charts compared to where we are now.

Only 13 percent of scientists, and 17 percent of Meterologists believe in the myth of Human caused Global Warming.

We could not stop Global Warming if it were occurring, and most competent individuals do not believe it is happening to any large degree.

Answer 4

Because some of us are older then 15 and remember things like "the ice age is coming back", "the end of the world is coming", "nuclear holocaust is here", "Aliens are invading our planet" and so on...

No one writes off caring for our planet, that is a "no brain-er"! But right now there is a panic being incited by some and it comes across as a planned political agenda. The subject needs to be addressed with calm - not hysteria! Also there are many scientist that feel just that way and have just walked out of a group putting together a studied response on this subject, for just that reason (over the top doom talk).

I think that; those that truly believe this is an important subject need not alienate others in a political manor!

Answer 5

No, it's not as simple as that. Take an environmental science class someday. Global warming and ozone degradation have little if anything to do with each other. Global warming arises from the increase in concentration of gasses which have a dipole moment which can absorb infrared radiation (e.g. water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane), thus trapping the heat radiated off of the earth once the sun's rays have hit and lost energy.

Ozone degradation came about due to the use of chlorofluorocarbons in aerosols and as refrigerants. As those compounds make their way to the upper atmosphere, the C-Cl bonds were cleaved homolytically (as those bonds are weakened by the electronegativity of the fluorines present), producing a Cl radical that can then speed up the degradation of ozone, O3, into the regular form of oxygen, O2. The process of ozone breaking down into diatomic oxygen and a lone oxygen atom, which can then attach to another diatomic molecule to reform O3 is always going on, as a result of ultraviolet radation from the sun, which is how the ozone layer protects us from certain frequencies of ultraviolet light, but the presence of the chlorine radicals reduces the ozone concentration, thus allowing ultraviolet light to pass through (the concentration of ozone in that layer is not really that high). With the Montreal Protocol, the elimination of production of chlorofluorocarbons and their reduced use throughout the world means that ozone degradation should reverse itself within the next half-century.

But then again, why let actual science get in the way of your political argument?

Answer 6

I don’t are conscious of it both. most of the arguments I’ve heard is that its organic for the earth to heart up and its occurred before. some others I’ve heard its continuously been this warm and the elements isn’t replacing in any respect. i imagine the human beings who're screaming scam and lies are all naïve, closed minded, and extremely egocentric. They don’t see the more advantageous image of what’s happening the following. The earth is warming at a larger fee than obviously. definite the earth does warmth up obviously yet human interest that wasn’t modern contained in the previous is rushing up the approach at an alarming fee. They don’t see that a temperature enhance is a huge deal no longer in simple terms because some ice caps you under no circumstances observed besides are melting away yet because flora and fauna will disappear as area of it and lives are positioned at stake. enhance in temperature means severe storms and as all of us know from hurricane Katrina and the Tsunami contained in the Indian Ocean those storms are literally not in simple terms deadly yet severe priced. I heard yet another rationalization why global warming is only a distraction from the authentic challenge the commercial gadget which must be fixed. Ummm global warming straight away contributes to the commercial gadget. The technology and study and jobs it create no longer in simple terms stimulate t yet in simple terms imagine if the U. S. were hit via yet another hurricane Katrina. What about that outcome on the commercial gadget? So this conception that it’s no longer a huge deal, it’s all organic, and there are more advantageous important issues are in simple terms erroneous critiques.

Answer 7

I think it is because there are those out there who say that this is not global warming, that there is proof that the earth goes through higher and lower temperature changes. Then again they keep saying that the temperature will go up 1-degree in the long term and people think 1-degree makes no difference.

Personally, I don't think global warming is that much of an issue anyway. If we don't kill each other before it becomes an issue we will have polluted earth so bad we will all die anyway. And we are the mentally advanced animals.....hummm.

Answer 8

I accept the possability of global warming, but who is to say that it is entirely the fault of humans.? What about the natural cycles? My understanding is that there are cycles of cooling and warming of the earths climates.
So what about the Ice Age? Are humans responsible for that as well? Or was it all the emissions from the wooly mammoths?
I guess I'm just not willing to jump on the self-loathing band wagon.

Answer 9

Conservatives believe in global warming they don't believe the connection between global warming and man's CO2 has been proven. MOST scientists do not believe it - about half do. Even the UN Report supposed 2000 scientists (hardly a majority) contains mere politicians and scientists that resigned who's names were not removed. Mars' ice caps are melting too, leading people to believe it's the sun. Liberals/socialists are using this platform as a scare tactic. If Al Gore really took this seriously, don't you think he'd give up the private jet?

Answer 10

its actually not as simple as that. science shows the ozone degradation is made by chemicals in aerosals degrade the ozone into oxygen. plus its hard to believe that our CO2 emittion is strong enough to cause an extra layer of ozone. plus we are leaving an ice age so the temperatures are naturally rising.

Answer 11

Since you don't even know the root causes of the so-called global warming theory, then why should I believe you when you say it exists?

You probably believe that the world will be 2000' underwater if the ice at both poles melt.