Should the President be Impeached for being an UN-AMERICAN Idiot?
2007-04-07 05:24:05 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
No, he should be impeached for failure to uphold his oath of office, specificly to defend the constitution. .
2007-04-07 05:30:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
No, Nixon was not impeached. He resigned before he was impeached. In the history of the United States, only 2 Presidents (Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton) have been impeached. Both were acquitted. There were also one cabinet member (Secretary of War William Belknap - acquitted), one Senator (Tennessee Senator William Blount - charges dismissed), and 13 federal judges (including one U.S. Supreme Court Justice - Samuel Chase) that were impeached. Impeachment is not the same as convicting someone of a crime. It is more like a Grand Jury indictment. It only says that there is enough evidence for the person to stand trial. At a federal level, impeachment happens in the U.S. House, and the trial happens in the U.S. Senate.
2016-04-01 02:13:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he should be impeached for lying to the country and for obstruction of justice. No man is above the law, not even a president. Honor and dignity? That fool is the most dishonorable person I can think of. Get some common sense. Also to the guy that wrote an essay...geez, this is a short answer space....if I wanted to read War and Peace, I would go to the library. And to the person that said he restored honor and dignity, yea rite........dream on. Did not know that mass murder of Iraq innocents brings about honor or dignity. Pathological liar and murderer...yep that sure is honorable.
2007-04-07 05:34:21 · answer #3 · answered by kolacat17 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
He should be impeached because they thought what Clinton did was an impeachable offense. He lied about a *******. Bush lied about WMDs and when he found out it wasn't true, he changed the reason of the war to "helping the Iraqi people establish a democratic system. Clinton's lie - 0 lives. Bush's lies - Over 30,000 U.S. and Iraqi lives.
2007-04-07 05:38:23 · answer #4 · answered by jax0817 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he should be impeached. He hates America, how can he say he loves America but he hates the citizens of this country. If he loves America, we wouldn't be in this position. He down sizes out military and our defenses, upgrades illegal immigrants (they commits crimes on a daily basis). He bullies the citizens of the United states.
When Americans cry and Americans thirst
This President won't put Americans first.
When Americans plea and Americans thirst
His regime will not put Americans first.
Celebrities have lost faith in their fans.
They prefer a man with, pen, phone and no plans.
Patrick Henry said, "When you take GOD out of your country, your country will be run by tyrants."
Leaders should lead by example. Let Ms Obama and her kids eat what the poor has to eat and the kids in our schools.
Songs on youtube: Soldiers & Jesus, Save the Country, God Bless America, God Bless America Again, Deck of Cards by Flom.
Even Heaven Cries for US. (United States)
2015-02-26 18:01:04 · answer #5 · answered by Chuck 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he should be impeached. I mean Richard Nixon was impeached because of the business with Watergate, and they were thinking of impeaching Clinton for his "family problems" that really had nothing to do with the mass population. Things that bush did are far more criminal and idiotic than the actions of Clinton or Nixon.
2007-04-07 05:31:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I wouldn't impeach him for being an idiot. But if we begin to dig into his affiliations with Enron and Halliburton, I bet there is something there, especially with regards to the blackouts in California in 2001 and no-bid contracts. I think there is definitely a case for going to war with Iraq and the misleading of America by lying about WMD's and the 9/11 Sadaam Hussein connection. But you have to prove this. I don't think the Democrats want to put their energy into this, but want to continue to show all of the mistakes and lack of ethical conduct demonstrated by this administration.
2007-04-07 05:33:52 · answer #7 · answered by David G 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think, instead of impeaching the president, we should remove people from the country who would have us lose this nation to radical islam; let them find their own nation and see if they can negotiate their own peace with the radicals that hate infadels. Good luck
2007-04-07 05:37:48 · answer #8 · answered by netjr 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No matter how many stupid things he's done (e.g., illegal immigration) he has not committed any impeachable offensives. You can't get impeached for being stupid.
No, he should not be impeached.
2007-04-07 05:30:35 · answer #9 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
He cant be impeached. He has to do Clinton type things to be impeached.
2007-04-07 05:29:48 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
i think he should. but by the time they got everything rolling in the court system, he would already be out of office and it wouldnt do any good other than to give the media something to report on. i totally agree with you that he is as you said"an unamerican idiot"
2007-04-07 05:31:34 · answer #11 · answered by ? 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋