i seriously have to question this womans motives...if she says she was in syria promoting the presidents agenda, then why doesnt she even show an iota of promoting it at home in the united states..??? if she is in fact over in the middle east promotinmg the democrats version of american foreign policy, then she is by all means chargeable with a felony offense under the constitution...since she was telling lies about israel intentions, and in fact, not passing on a message from israel to syria as she has claimed, isnt this the worst sort of meddling in world affairs an elected official has done short of actually spying for another country that is diplomatically trying to undermine united states interests...and thus makes her an agent of that country...and thus by doing this, makes her a traitor to america, according to the oath she swore to take office...."uphold and enforce the constitution of the united states of america"....?????
2007-04-07
05:21:03
·
15 answers
·
asked by
badjanssen
5
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
She is traitor and an idiot. I agree with what you have said, but did you know that she has managed to offend some Muslims in Syria. Read this to see what they say about the witch.
http://www.reformsyria.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=282&Itemid=66
2007-04-07 05:43:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by JudiBug 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
First off, I am proud of her for having the guts and incentive to try to establish dialog. Why do you think the only way to solve anything is thru battle or brute force? Maybe that is one reason America is so hated worldwide. You are so full of it. What if Reagan had not talked to Gorbachev during the cold war? She took a first step toward peace. Uno, being a patriot does not mean agreeing with everything Bush says. Most of America thinks he is out of touch with reality and they want this war stopped. People are dying daily. Bush has made more terrorists than we ever had before. Bin Laden is still alive and well. I guarantee had Pelosi been Republican and male you would be cheering her on. Wake up to the situation this country is in. Get some common sense. The traitor to this country is sitting in the oval office calling himself " the decider" and I am just hoping there will still be an America by the time he is thru.
2007-04-07 05:28:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by kolacat17 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
I don't think it is possible to bumble 1's way to become Speaker of the House, therefore, she must be a traitor.
She should be allowed back in & then put on trial under the Logan act.
2007-04-07 06:09:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
there is nothing you can say to make the statement 'nancy pelosi is a traitor' have any veracity. She is the speaker of the house of reps., she's third in line to the presidency, she represents what the founders intended to be the most powerful part of the government, shutup you idiot conservatives and get over the fact she is being diplomatic.
2007-04-07 05:26:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by aristotle1776 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
NANCY PELOSI BACKED UP THE PRESIDENT'S POLICIES. REPUBLICANS VISITED SYRIA ALSO. DENNIS HASTERT IS THE REAL TRAITOR...
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/04/04/hastert-colombia/
FLASHBACK: Hastert Traveled Abroad, Told Foreign Leaders Not To Listen To Clinton
President Bush yesterday said Speaker Pelosi’s bipartisan delegation to Syria sends “mixed signals,” implying that Pelosi overstepped her bounds by merely visiting Syria.
Bush’s supporters have been repeating the argument:
Former ambassador John Bolton: “I would simply hope that people would understand that, under the Constitution, the president conducts foreign policy, not the speaker of the House.”
Former Gov. Mitt Romney: “It has long been the established principle of this country that the president of the United States leads our foreign policy. And if you don’t like the president, then you change him. But you don’t have the two parties each conducting foreign policy in the way they think it ought to be conducted.”
Speaker Pelosi has done nothing to suggest that she intended to speak on behalf of President Bush or the U.S. Government. But her predecessors haven’t been so respectful.
In 1997, Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) led a delegation to Colombia at a time when U.S. officials were trying to attach human rights conditions to U.S. security assistance programs. Hastert specifically encouraged Colombian military officials to “bypass” President Clinton and “communicate directly with Congress.”
…a congressional delegation led by Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL) which met with Colombian military officials, promising to “remove conditions on assistance” and complaining about “leftist-dominated” U.S. congresses of years past that “used human rights as an excuse to aid the left in other countries.” Hastert said he would to correct this situation and expedite aid to countries allied in the war on drugs and also encouraged Colombian military officials to “bypass the U.S. executive branch and communicate directly with Congress.”
Subsequently, U.S. Ambassador to Colombia Myles Frechette sent a cable complaining that Hastert’s actions had undermined his leverage with the Colombian military leadership.
In other instances, Hastert actually guided congressional staff to unilaterally reach deals with Colombian officials:
House Foreign Affairs Committee staff, at the direction of the Hastert group, would fly to Colombia, meet with the nation’s anti-narcotics police and negotiate the levels and terms of assistance, the scope of the program and the kinds of equipment that would be needed. Rarely were the U.S. diplomatic personnel in our embassy in Bogata consulted about the “U.S.” position in these negotiations, and in a number of instances they were excluded from or not even made aware of the meetings.
If the right is looking for members of Congress clearly infringing on the president’s constitutional prerogatives, they should look at Hastert, not Pelosi.
2007-04-07 05:58:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
She should be escorted back and tried as a traitor! SHE has no business doing what she is doing! she is soh not a diplomat She could start a war making promises on her own!
2007-04-07 05:36:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by mark k 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I would think ALL of them are traitors if they don't try to stop the SPP (Security and Prosperity Program) which takes away our rights as a nation.
Don't believe me? How about Chertoff stating that the DHS is now under SPP?
http://www.judicialwatch.org/6216.shtml
The actual DOCUMENTS are at the bottom of the article.
2007-04-07 05:25:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by hera 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
She doesn't promote it at home because people are sick of it. She went to Syria to try to accomplish something that the republicans can't.
Since Bush's foriegn policy has failed on all fronts.. someone has to promote an alternative. Something that will work.
2007-04-07 05:25:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by David L 6
·
6⤊
4⤋
I am almost certain the 5 republicans who went have not came under the same scrutiny as Ms. Pelosi has.
Do you mind explaining that?
2007-04-07 05:32:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Eyota Xin 3
·
3⤊
4⤋
I wouldn't go as far as calling her a traitor.
Idiot who ended up being a pawn for the Syrians, yes, but not a traitor.
2007-04-07 05:27:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
2⤊
5⤋