I have never (or my children) been forced to be exposed to an "asexual parade", can't say that about the other.
2007-04-07 03:56:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Micah 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Asexuality is usually treated well because they are permanently celebate/abstinant and that is a good thing. I get lots of praise for being abstinant and a virgin at 25. No STDs/pregnancy to worry about, makes life easier.
2007-04-10 08:06:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by Abstinence_Education 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Actually, they are somewhat treated the same... Or people who are "asexual" are mistook for being gay. I've never had a boyfriend and don't want one, and people think I'm a lesbian for that. o_O Nobody can believe that I just don't want a boyfriend.
2007-04-07 09:56:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Koko 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Basically because people won't feel as uncomfortable, intimidated or bothered by an asexual person than a gay one. There wouldn't be any tension whatsoever.
2007-04-07 09:51:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by eissy 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
How many openly "asexual" people have you seen marching in parades or protests?
How many of them have you seen demanding their rights? Gays have an agenda. They want to make their lifestyle mainstream and acceptable.
They want my kids to believe that 'anything goes' is okay. They want to make us accept "marriage" between 2 same sex persons , even though I find this idea totally against all my religious beliefs. I am extremely offended by their pushiness and insistence on being "equal" to heterosexuals.
BTW, asexual has to do with reproduction by fragmentation, binary fission and budding; I don't think it has anything to do with who you desire or don't desire
2007-04-07 10:13:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by nowyouknow 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
Asexuals are treated the wose. Try telling a bunch of guys your a virgin. You will be ridiculed and it will be tolerated. If you gay they wont say anything to your face.
2007-04-07 10:06:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by wisemancumth 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because many don't even know what asexual behaviour is. If it was more widely known about, it would get it's fair share of dirt. I don't think it's right to judge but once it becomes more known, it will be judged.
2007-04-07 10:45:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by luvmuzik 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Asexuals aren't disturbing cause they practically don't disturb others for their non-existent sexual needs. Whereas gays are seen in a more disturbing way as they could approach another straight man and try to make him one of them.
2007-04-07 09:57:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Soaring 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
The bible says some things about being gay but nothing about being celibate like Jesus.
2007-04-07 09:52:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Is there really such a thing as an asexual?
2007-04-07 09:55:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋