I completely agree with you!!!!!
2007-04-07 02:28:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Yoda_Yodel 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
And the winner is oh he's so lovable and there 2000 votes interior both hr time reduce. unhappy promoting and little women are operating the instruct. the finest singer hardly ever wins in those competitions! Im no longer pretending to understand who that's or how severe they are going to upward thrust. in my opinion and it hardly ever concerns in this challenge. vote casting is negative and the more youthful female Jessica has the finest voice and with a lot of work can or will positioned out some fairly staggering tunes.
2016-11-27 00:58:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It seems much easier in theory but I think you'd find the results to be really warped to nearly the same. Also, it'd be confusing. People process things better when instructions are given in the affirmative. In other words, people understand "vote for who you'd like to win" much easier than "vote for who you'd like to lose" or who you don't want to win. Remember this isn't Survivor or a show in which the participants vote off another participant. The audience [judges] is the world, which is composed of people from different socioeconomic and educational backgrounds. On shows like Survivor, the participants go through an intensive testing process before producers decide who will and will not participate.
2007-04-07 02:32:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by Nuseed 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have been thinking this for years. Even before Sanjaya.
All other reality shows vote someone off.
American Idol has run its course. I can not imagine it lsating more than 1 more go around.
2007-04-07 02:30:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mr. G 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
That would be a Good way, but Someone would surely alter that ..
I think, it should be done ..to a certain extent ..like " dancing with the stars OR America's got talent ... Guest Judges who are just that ..
Paula needs a rehab trip
Randy needs to be the spokes model for " Weight Watchers for men "
Simon .. needs to get his girlfriend, and take a LONG vacation back to the UK .. rethink his show ..and GROW American balls and say " Stop ruining my Bloody show " with STUPID Finalists !!!
2007-04-07 02:37:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by boopinangel 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Umm. I think people are more willing to vote when for the positive. If we did it negatively, then a good number of people voting according to talent etc. will not vote, and we probably won't get the right winners.
2007-04-07 02:30:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by xdannifenx 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would gladly vote the whole show right of the television.
2007-04-07 02:31:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by CrazyFarmer 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I do
2007-04-07 04:44:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by duh 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i totally agree
2007-04-07 02:29:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Great Suggestion - I'll ask Randy and Paula what they think. Thanks, Simon
2007-04-07 02:28:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋