1.)global warming = because it is already evident...
2.)nuke war = because the powers that be would like to drastically reduce the world population..
3.)the end the world = there is nothing after the end of the world.. the end of civilization comes long before the end of the world.
Does this help any?
2007-04-07 00:57:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
WELL global warming is already happening... it's its effects that haven't really majorly affected anyone, or at least it's not obvious to them that global warming is the cause and a real isuue. but it's current.
and the nuke war... well we can't really predict the future. it can always slap us right back. in the next hundred years, it might happen. and then i would say if the world survives somehow (at least some part of it)... the end of the world will follow. so either right away either in 1000 or more years i don't know.
to tell you the truth i don't get this question.
2007-04-07 08:51:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by q 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Global warming, which will cause flooding in some places, drought in others. Hundreds of millions will die.
Don't know if that will lead to nuclear war, but it might.
As for the end of the world, I suggest you go to www.livescience.com. They have several scenarios for ending life on this planet as well as destroying earth. Which one do you mean? Like global warming, life will end on this planet, but not for a very long time.
2007-04-07 07:57:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wouldn't a nuke war and the end of the world be in the same boat together?
2007-04-07 08:12:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by tucker142002 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
let us hold our faith in a human being. We are wise. We are all going to stand togather for survival. any way controlling Globlal warming is going to happen first ... rather is already began
2007-04-07 07:58:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by hasmukh mehta 1
·
0⤊
0⤋