According to the Pakistani government and citizenry, Pakistan has a rightful and just claim to Kashmir because the majority of the people in Kashmir are Muslims, right???
Well, the Pakistani government is forgetting that India has the world's second largest Muslim population (although they comprise only 12% of the Indian population - 83% being hindu). I think there are approximately 150 million Muslims who constitute India's Muslim minority.
My solution is this:
We can say to Pakistan that we will ONLY relinquish control of Kashmir to yourselves, IF YOU TAKE ALL INDIA'S MUSLIMS, ALONG WITH KASHMIR AND GRANT THEM CITIZENSHIP OF PAKISTAN!!!
I don't mean to sound heartless and I apologise if I have caused any offence. But the purpose of 1947 partition was so that India can become a Muslim free zone.
Do you agree with me??? Ain't I right??? Pakistan should open its borders to India's Muslims and only then get kashmir?
2007-04-06
21:23:28
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Dear Prithvi,
You are 100% correct. However, there were also many hindus living in Pakistan and Bangladesh who wanted to stay there and were just as patriotic as muslims. Were they allowed to do so???
2007-04-08
02:26:28 ·
update #1
All Indian Muslims must go to Kashmir and it is the only time that Kashmir will become part of Pakistan. India will be at peace without the Muslims.
2007-04-06 22:50:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
0⤊
5⤋
Well its not about Pakistan "thinks" that Kashmir should be with it, Its About Kachmiris who want to be with Pakistan......Every Kashmiri has this desire that they should be with Pakistan....And thats why Pakistan sopport them...As if you remeber about some other states Gordarpur(Sp??) which was Hindu majority area but the ruler was muslim and he decided to join with Pakistan but India attacked it and got it joined back with India.....becuase the public wanted it....Now Telling you Kashmir problem is not chosen by India or Pakistan.this is imposed on both of them.....This enemity is a punishment for them for asking a freedom....Now both can not back off....And telling you the truth none of these countries want this enemity becuase it is doing no good to any of these instead they are lagging bahind and are still the "developing" countries becuase of it...as they spend a huge Budget on their defence !
Now there is a better solution of Kashmir problem and that was given by "Nehru Jee"......and that is "let kashmiri decide what they want" A promise that was made with them in 1948 and is not been fulfilled as yet...This is the simplest solution of this problem then why to bother about others??......Well Pakistan is ready to take all the muslims in Pakistan but with that you will have to give some land to those muslims as well.........Becuase afterall they own something...."area according to the population ratio".......as happend in 1948.........and would india ever allow this? Giving away the population with the Land?? Ofcourse Not !!! As they could not forget the seperation as yet and some percentage of indians still Want Pakistan back."Akhand Baharat"(Sp??) is a very common notion ! If this is possible for india to accept the "full" solution to this problem then why not !! Pakistan also want to be at peace with their neighbours ! and without any conflicts !!
"I don't mean to sound heartless and I apologise if I have caused any offence. But the purpose of 1947 partition was so that India can become a Muslim free zone"
I don't think this was the purpose actualy but the reality was that could not live togather in on place because of the differences...and thats why they wanted separation....see it was good for india as well...now you are living more in peace then living togather!
peace !
2007-04-06 21:51:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by ★Roshni★ 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
You are absolutely right that the basis of partition in 1947 was that India will be Muslim free country and Pakistan would be Hindu free. This is the impression that was genrated by the leaders who wanted to get into power to rule replacing the British at the earliest.That you call yourselevs Secular State does not mean that you have changed the basis of Partision. Those Hindus who have stayed back in Pakistan has accepted that reality. The same is not accepted by the Muslims in India. You may feel betrayed and want to send them to Kashmir.
But one cannot go back to rewite history. Muslims in India may not be pleased with merely getting treated equally with the Hindust, they want special treatment. Given the version of democracy of the illiterate, by the ruffians and for the corrupt, there is no solution to the problem of Kashmir to be devised by anyone.. It will get solved on its own. Pakistan and India have formed the habit of trying to solve the problem. The problem cannot get solved, because the habit of trying is difficult to shed.
2007-04-08 17:50:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by sensekonomikx 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
some muslim activists needed a separate state for muslims. That replaced into the reason for 1947 partition. Partition wasn't started to verify a separate hindu state. so a techniques as Kashmir is in touch, it fairly is a factor of India and could stay a factor of India whatever occurs. And concerning to the muslims in India, they are Indians, they are our brothers. you may no longer study them to pakistanis. India is a u . s . a . with fairly super selection of cultures, languages, and religions. Hinduism isn't the identity of an Indian. The identity is Indian-ness. Separateing the country in accordance with religions will merely split aside the country. The presence of India could gradually fade away. Pakistan would call Indian muslims as their non secular brothers, yet whilst it incorporates attractiveness, merely undergo in recommendations what's happenning with taaliban. Edit 01: You communicate approximately Hinduism, and so referred to as Hindu scripts have continuously preached brotherhood, unity, peace. Secondly, the term Hindu replaced into utilized by potential of the europeans to refer the individuals dwelling previous the valleys of river Sindhu. those europeans had no concept what faith those human beings belonged to. The so referred to as Hindu scriptures haven't any descritpion of the term Hindu. Hindusim is a cutlure, a lifestyle. it is not a faith merely because of the fact few human beings around the globe save on with a stupid inhumanitarian course does no longer propose that we could continuously save on with the comparable. And in case you think of employing away Muslims could resolve the countries issues, then please tell me how the hell are you gonna resolve the themes concerning to ALFA's, ULFA's, BODO's, Naxalites, etc.? they are all hindu terrorist companies in India. in case you fairly wanna help the country, then please make the main of a few time in spreading patriotism, unfold the sensation of Indian-ness, the experience of team spirit between Indians. Donot attempt to widen the rifts. all of the excellent... :-)
2016-10-21 06:28:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
nothing
not a single inch.
Indian Muslims are a parts of India.
2007-04-07 12:17:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by C B S 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
what about patriotic muslims of india like our president dr. kalam . this is not solution , not a single muslim will go to pakistan ,
" pakistan needs third degree remand . "
2007-04-07 23:41:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by prithvi 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The Person propagating falsehood and enemity among the people, as his custom, tradition, culture and way of life is severely infected with the virus & bacteria of chronic hate, hatred and enemity against those who profess and practise a religion, accepted universally. His genes & DNAs are also infected so seriously. To protect his children (to be born) against such infections, he should join and remain in the company of sensible, true, learned, educated, justified, honest and healthy males for NIYOGA or else his evil, false and deceptive thoughts will spread more.
The present India consisted of thousands of small kingdoms, all ruled by locals. The Muslims settled down in India and made it their mother land. They united the small kingdoms and made it into Bharat Mata. They never interfered into the belief & faith of the locals. Locals also never considered them enemies, but welcomed.
India is a country of multi religion, region, language, custom, tradition, culture, costume, food habits, etc. All live together sharing each others joys and sorrows. 99+% people are very peace loving. 1% miscreants wanted to disturb the peace & tranquility of India but failed. Knowledge is spreading. Truths and falsehoods are being separated. Truths will always prevail and the falsehood will end. Muslims living in India have rejected the Pakistan and opted for India. Enemity against them will not help in Indian development. They always participate in the well being of their mother land.
Fanatic Hindus burnt and destroyed and are burning & destroying hundreds/thousands of churches in India and are continuing these nefarious acts openly & fearlessly in the daylight. The strongest Hindu organisations Bajrang Dal and Ruling Parties Shiv Sena and BJP publicly support it and claim it their success. The Australian preacher of Christianity and his son were burnt alive in their vehicle by a mob of fanatic Hindus, none got the punishment but rewarded. These fanatics challenge that except Hindus none should remain in India. Can they succeed? Are they thus serving the mother land? 99% Hindus condemn them and have sympathies with the victims.
To put a powerful brake upon spreading hatred & enemity among Indians, it is diagonised that such chronic infected cannot be cured and only preventive remedy can be useful. Such infected is prescribed to avail of the company of healthy and sincere gentlemen for NIYOGA to save future children from his such infection.
2007-04-07 05:32:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
do you realize the conversion rate of islam in india, they are avoiding the silly caste system over there with due all respect
2007-04-12 08:35:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have read. Maine aap ka idea hans ke pada hai.
2007-04-06 21:27:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I totally agree.
2007-04-14 06:27:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by johnfarber2000 6
·
0⤊
1⤋