English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Him and Geraldo Thursday, anyone see that? O'Reilly went freaking ballistic, calling Geraldo an anarchist and such.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLPuGuaZTx8
It gets good at (2:20ish).

2007-04-06 18:03:08 · 14 answers · asked by Liberals love America! 6 in News & Events Media & Journalism

pjerry- listen to what O'Reilly says at 1:12 and listen to geraldo's 1st response, he does want our borders secure. He is more worried about drunk drivers than illegal immigrants.

2007-04-06 18:13:02 · update #1

Geez, even with the crappy video quality, you still see O'Reilly's forehead vein pop up.

2007-04-06 18:16:55 · update #2

14 answers

It is classic Oreilly. Yelling and intimidating to back up his straw arguements. And Riviera is the only person stupid enough to try to debate his racist bull sh**

This is one incident that Oreilly has found-in all of the USA mind you - and he is going to use it to justify ridiculous border laws. Always have to be at war with someone.

Geraldo is not defending drunk drivers. He made 2 good points, there were 370 other cases of drunk driving deaths in that state that Oreilly doesnt care about, and illegal immigrants commit far less crimes then the average citizen.

2007-04-06 18:06:52 · answer #1 · answered by theDrake 3 · 0 3

I am not a fan of Bill O'Reilly, and I did not get to see all of this debate, but wasn't OReiily stating the facts that our borders should be closed to all illegals.

I have always been a fan of Geraldo. I will watch Geraldo Saturday Night, this is his time on Fox News.

2007-04-06 18:20:26 · answer #2 · answered by NJ 6 · 0 0

HE in no way HAD ONE TO began WITH. from time to time he's so off the dimensions of human intelligences, i've got confidence he's paid an good-looking some to be so darn smug? He can no longer carry the candle to Geraldo Riviera. Geraldo replaced into in New Orleans merely after the typhoon KATRINA, reporting on the situations and the human suffering, he replaced into between the individuals who have been hurting. Do you think of for one 2nd that invoice O'reilly could be between the individuals who're hurting? easily no longer!

2016-10-21 06:18:05 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Wow! Thanks for the weblink (I think that's what it's called).
They both sort of lost it , didn't they?
Now I wish I knew the Schmo'Reilly words that Rivera was so uptight about. It was clear Geraldo thinks Bill 'spun' remarks about the drunk driver's illegal alien status excessively and O'R. wasn't going to admit it.
Here's another example of two assertive talking teevee heads
butting them - (their heads) - over a hot-button issue du jour.
I can understand and forgive Geraldo his passionate protectionist attitude toward hispanics, being of the hispanic persuasion himself but once he has had his say he should let it go. (Is the guy bucking for canonization or something?).
Same goes for Mr. O'R. It should be - sit down, say your piece, shut-up. Next.
They both have a point.
This is one time I'm with that smart-alec Mick, though. That is if all he did was stress that the perp was an illegal alien. The problem (read: Dangers) of illegal, uninvited guests in this country needs to be broadcast far and wide.
Thanks for the heads-up. I starred you

2007-04-06 18:50:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I agree. Geraldo made a good point that this was a drunk driving issue. How many other drunk driving fatalities did O'Reilly cover that didn't involve illegal immigrants? I think Bill has lost it. He has this weird obsession with Rosie O'Donnell. He goes on and on about her every night on his show. I think he's secretly in love with her and he tried his old sexual harassment techniques on her and she rebuffed him and now he's mad. The Geraldo thing and him trying to draw Rosie in for a celeb "feud" are just publicity stunts for him to draw attention to his one-sided "show".

2007-04-06 19:01:45 · answer #5 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 1 1

One might ask the same question about Geraldo. Both men seemed a bit peevish on that occasion. As to whom was deemed to be crazy I suppose depends on whose ox was being gored.

2007-04-06 18:06:31 · answer #6 · answered by Mad Roy 6 · 0 0

Obviously, you were not listening. He accused Geraldo of wanting 'Anarchy' in this country because Geraldo doesn't want our border laws enforced.

2007-04-06 18:08:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Bill's getting pretty desperate- facing off against Geraldo. His ratings must be slipping...

2007-04-06 18:09:09 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 1 1

O'Reilly's a nut case for sure. I don't know how he's managed to keep it together this long. I have never been a fan of his; but in my opinion he confirmed he was a full pledged nut case when he walked out on the interview with Terry Gross on NPR over a year ago.

2007-04-06 18:08:19 · answer #9 · answered by danaluana 5 · 1 3

They are probably good friends and Bill knows what he's doing. Either they love you or they dislike you but they always watch you.

2007-04-06 18:09:26 · answer #10 · answered by Michael A 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers